首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society >Fusion Criteria for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Intervertebral Cages : The Significance of Traction Spur
【24h】

Fusion Criteria for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Intervertebral Cages : The Significance of Traction Spur

机译:后路椎间融合器椎间融合术的融合标准:牵引骨的意义。

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective The purpose of this study was to establish new fusion criteria to complement existing Brantigan-Steffee fusion criteria. The primary purpose of intervertebral cage placement is to create a proper biomechanical environment through successful fusion. The existence of a traction spur is an essential predictable radiologic factor which shows that there is instability of a fusion segment. We studied the relationship between the existence of a traction spur and fusion after a posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) procedure. Methods This study was conducted using retrospective radiological findings from patients who underwent a PLIF procedure with the use of a cage without posterior fixation between 1993 and 1997 at a single institution. We enrolled 183 patients who were followed for a minimum of five years after the procedure, and used the Brantigan-Steffee classification to confirm the fusion. These criteria include a denser and more mature bone fusion area than originally achieved during surgery, no interspace between the cage and the vertebral body, and mature bony trabeculae bridging the fusion area. We also confirmed the existence of traction spurs on fusion segments and non-fusion segments. Results The PLIF procedure was done on a total of 251 segments in 183 patients (71 men and 112 women). The average follow-up period was 80.4 ± 12.7 months. The mean age at the time of surgery was 48.3 ± 11.3 years (range, 25 to 84 years). Among the 251 segments, 213 segments (84.9%) were fused after five years. The remaining 38 segments (15.1%) were not fused. An analysis of the 38 segments that were not fused found traction spur formation in 20 of those segments (52.6%). No segments had traction spur formation with fusion. Conclusion A new parameter should be added to the fusion criteria. These criteria should be referred to as 'no traction spur formation' and should be used to confirm fusion after a PLIF procedure.
机译:目的本研究的目的是建立新的融合标准,以补充现有的布兰坦根-史蒂夫融合标准。椎间融合器放置的主要目的是通过成功融合创造适当的生物力学环境。牵引力的存在是可预测的基本放射学因素,表明融合节段不稳定。我们研究了腰椎后路椎体间融合术(PLIF)后牵引骨的存在与融合之间的关系。方法这项研究是根据回顾性放射学发现进行的,该发现来自于1993年至1997年间在单个机构中使用PLIF手术并使用不带后固定装置的笼子进行PLIF手术的患者。我们招募了183名在手术后至少随访5年的患者,并使用Brantigan-Steffee分类法确认融合。这些标准包括比手术期间最初获得的骨密度更高,更成熟的骨融合区域,笼子与椎体之间没有空隙以及桥接融合区域的成熟骨小梁。我们还确认了在融合段和非融合段上存在牵引马刺。结果183例患者(男71例,女112例)共进行251个节段的PLIF手术。平均随访时间为80.4±12.7个月。手术时的平均年龄为48.3±11.3岁(范围为25至84岁)。五年后,在251个细分中,有213个细分(84.9%)被融合。其余38个片段(占15.1%)未融合。对38个未融合的链段进行分析后,发现其中20个链段形成了牵引毛刺(52.6%)。没有节段融合形成牵引支线。结论应该在融合标准中添加一个新参数。这些标准应称为“无牵引毛刺形成”,并应用于在PLIF程序后确认融合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号