首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization >Characteristic of Land Dispute Settlement in Indonesian District Court Based on Audi Et Alteram Partem Principle
【24h】

Characteristic of Land Dispute Settlement in Indonesian District Court Based on Audi Et Alteram Partem Principle

机译:基于Audi Et Alteram Partem原则的印度尼西亚地方法院土地争议解决的特征

获取原文
           

摘要

Principle of judiciary implementation in Indonesia: impartial, open and honest. Land dispute settlement can be proceeded in the Civil Court guided by principle in Civil Procedure Law namely Audi et alteram partem (hear both parties). Land rights disputes are usually a matter of priority to be established as holders of legitimate rights over land with rights or without rights. Characteristic of land rights lawsuits are generally in the form of disputes of acts against the law and/or breach of contract, although in its development there are other types of lawsuits such as class action. The land dispute settlement is not easy, requiring special handling with characteristics depending on the status of the inherent rights therein. Settlement by kinship, deliberations outside the court and or if it fails then it can be preceded to litigation (court). In a fair litigation process for the parties, Audi et alteram partem principle should be used as the basis by the judge in deciding the dispute and until today the rule of Dutch law, HIR and RBG is still prevail. This article aims in order that government to regulate the principle of Audi et alteram partem in Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 48 Year 2009 on Judicial Power or a new Civil Procedure Law which will replace the Herziene Indonesisch Reglement (HIR). To achieve these objectives then socialization is required, discussions involving academician, practitioners and government as well as legal awareness of society and law enforcers.
机译:印度尼西亚司法机构实施的原则:公正,开放和诚实。土地纠纷的解决可以在民事诉讼法的原则(即“听证会”和“另一方”(听证双方))的指导下在民事法院进行。土地权纠纷通常是优先事项,应确定为对有权利或无权利的土地拥有合法权利。土地权利诉讼的特征通常是针对法律的行为纠纷和/或违反合同的形式,尽管在发展过程中还存在其他类型的诉讼,例如集体诉讼。土地争端的解决并不容易,需要根据其固有权利的状况进行特殊处理。通过亲属关系和庭外和解解决,或者如果解决不了,则可以提起诉讼(法院)。在对双方的公平诉讼过程中,法官应使用“奥迪和交替诉讼”原则作为基础来确定争议,直到今天,荷兰法律,HIR和RBG的规则仍然盛行。本文旨在使政府能够规范《印度尼西亚共和国第48年2009年司法权法》或一部新的《民事诉讼法》,以取代《奥迪·印尼独立条例》(HIR)。为了实现这些目标,则需要社会化,包括院士,从业人员和政府的讨论,以及对社会和执法者的法律意识。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号