首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry >Comparison of behavioral response to caries removal methods: A randomised controlled cross over trial
【24h】

Comparison of behavioral response to caries removal methods: A randomised controlled cross over trial

机译:对龋齿去除方法的行为反应比较:随机对照试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The issue of dental fear and anxiety still poses a significant problem in treating children. Various caries management protocols have been tried to make the dental visit more compatible to the child patients. Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the behavioral and physiological responses to chemo-mechanical caries removal (CMCR) and conventional drilling method (CDM). Materials and Methods: A total of 20 children with an age range of 7 to 11 years with bilateral frank carious lesions were included in this study. They were randomized into two groups: Group A - treated with CDM first followed by CMCR and Group B - treated with CMCR first followed by CDM. The physiological signs (pulse, blood pressure and oxygen saturation) were noted prior to treatment, during treatment, post treatment and 5 min after treatment. The behavioral responses were assessed by face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability scale and facial image scale. The participants were interviewed about pain, discomfort, taste, smell, preference and overall experience after every procedure. The pediatric dentist filled in details about patient behavior, time utilized and need for local anesthesia. The results were statistically analyzed using t-test and Chi-square test appropriately (SPSS version 11). Results: There was no significant difference in any of the physiological parameters assessed between the two groups. Discomfort was significantly more (P 0.025) in the CDM group than CMCR group. The time taken by the dentist was significantly lesser (P 0.01) in the CDM group. Conclusion: Techniques which enhance the behavioral response in children should be considered for a better pediatric dental practice.
机译:背景:牙齿恐惧症和焦虑症仍然是治疗儿童的重要问题。已经尝试了各种龋齿管理方案以使牙齿访视更适合儿童患者。目的:本研究的目的是评估和比较对化学机械性龋齿清除(CMCR)和常规钻孔方法(CDM)的行为和生理反应。材料与方法:这项研究共纳入20名7至11岁的双侧坦率龋齿患儿。他们被随机分为两组:A组-先用CDM治疗,然后进行CMCR治疗; B组-先用CMCR治疗,然后进行CDM治疗。在治疗前,治疗期间,治疗后和治疗后5分钟记录生理指标(脉搏,血压和血氧饱和度)。行为反应通过面部,腿部,活动,哭泣以及可及性量表和面部图像量表进行评估。在每次手术后,对参与者进行有关疼痛,不适,味道,气味,偏好和总体体验的访谈。儿科牙医填写了有关患者行为,所用时间和局部麻醉需求的详细信息。使用t检验和卡方检验(SPSS 11版)对结果进行统计分析。结果:两组之间评估的任何生理参数均无显着差异。 CDM组的不适感明显高于CMCR组(P <0.025)。在CDM组中,牙医花费的时间明显更少(P <0.01)。结论:应考虑采用能增强儿童行为反应的技术,以更好地改善儿童牙科实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号