首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education >Cross‐Boundary Peer Learning in the Mekong: A Case of Field‐Based Education in Natural Resources Management
【24h】

Cross‐Boundary Peer Learning in the Mekong: A Case of Field‐Based Education in Natural Resources Management

机译:湄公河地区的跨界同伴学习:以自然资源管理领域的实地教育为例

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The Mekong has been the subject of a great deal of research and institutional innovation, both in the fields of regional economic integration (Australian Mekong Resource Centre 2007; Oehlers 2006) and of transboundary river basin management (Hirsch and Jensen 2006; Lebel et al. 2007). The Mekong Region as a cooperative development arena and the Mekong River Basin as a shared resource are represented institutionally through the Greater Mekong Subregion framework and the Mekong River Commission respectively. Bilateral and other multilateral institutions have also proliferated to respond to emerging challenges and opportunities. Increasingly, and despite considerable obstacles, such intergovernmental arrangements have been mirrored by non-governmental initiatives and strategies to develop civil society linkages through a kind of “regionalization from below” (Hirsch 2001; Khaosa-ard and Dore 2003).To date, however, active educational linkages within the Mekong framework have been quite limited. Within each riparian country, teaching about development, environment, and natural resource management has been limited mainly to generic knowledge, case studies from within each country, or textbook-based examples from other parts of the world. Despite high-level initiatives among university administrators such as the Greater Mekong Subregion Academic Research Network, there has been sparse exposure of teachers and students to comparative material from neighboring countries, and limited understanding among tertiary-level students of the Mekong River Basin as a shared resource or the Greater Mekong Region as an integrated development arena. This means that university students as the new generation of professionals continue to lag behind the rapid pace of regionalization in terms of a shared knowledge base and mutual understandings of diverse perspectives in different countries of the region.In this paper, we present an innovative exercise designed to be a modest building block in the construction of a regional learning community. The exercise is a research-based teaching exchange (hereafter referred to as “research exchange”) between programs at Yunnan University in China, Ubon Ratchathani University in northeast Thailand and the Royal University of Phnom Penh in Cambodia. The Yunnan students are enrolled in a Master of Human Geography, which emphasizes development issues with a primary focus on China and draws case studies mainly from Yunnan. The Ubon Ratchathani students are taught by the Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Liberal Arts which offers both undergraduate and graduate degrees in Social Development. The main focuses of the program are social sciences research methodology and development theory, providing students with basic skills through a practicum course outside the classroom. The program includes field-based learning in communities, and most of the field work is in northeastern Thailand. Therefore, learning about neighboring countries is very limited. The Royal University of Phnom Penh students are undertaking an undergraduate degree in Environmental Science. The program mainly focuses on classroom-based teaching within inter-disciplinary fields relevant to natural resources and environmental management. Field-based learning has the status of a supplementary course without credits. In all three cases, therefore, there is limited opportunity for learning outside the classroom and beyond the national context.The cross-boundary research exchange is innovative in two main respects. First, it is a central activity of the Mekong Learning Initiative, the first significant attempt to develop a practical collaboration between teachers and students in cognate areas of environment, natural resource management, and rural social change at eight universities in five Mekong counties. Second, it challenges conventional teacher-focused classroom-based learning through development of a field-oriented approach that we refer to as cross
机译:在区域经济一体化领域(澳大利亚湄公河资源中心2007年; Oehlers 2006年)和跨界流域管理领域(Hirsch and Jensen 2006年; Lebel等人),湄公河一直是众多研究和体制创新的主题。 2007)。湄公河区域作为合作发展领域,湄公河流域作为共享资源分别通过大湄公河次区域框架和湄公河委员会在体制上代表。双边机构和其他多边机构也已激增,以应对新出现的挑战和机遇。尽管存在许多障碍,但这种政府间安排越来越多地反映在非政府倡议和战略中,这些倡议和战略通过一种“从下而上的区域化”来发展民间社会的联系(Hirsch,2001; Khaosa-ard和Dore,2003)。湄公河框架内积极的教育联系非常有限。在每个沿岸国家中,有关发展,环境和自然资源管理的教学主要限于通用知识,每个国家的案例研究或来自世界其他地区的基于教科书的示例。尽管大湄公河次区域学术研究网络等大学行政管理人员采取了高层举措,但师生很少接触邻国的比较材料,而湄公河流域的大专生之间的了解有限资源或大湄公河区域作为一个综合发展领域。这意味着,作为新一代专业人士,大学生在共享知识基础和对本地区不同国家的不同观点的相互理解方面继续落后于区域化的快速步伐。成为区域学习社区建设中的温和基石。该练习是中国云南大学,泰国东北部的乌汶叻差他尼大学和柬埔寨的金边皇家大学之间的项目之间的基于研究的教学交流(以下称为“研究交流”)。云南学生入读《人类地理学硕士》,该硕士课程侧重于发展问题,主要侧重于中国,并主要从云南进行案例研究。乌汶叻差他尼大学的学生由人文学院社会科学系教授,该系提供社会发展的本科和研究生学位。该计划的主要重点是社会科学研究方法和发展理论,通过课堂外的实践课程为学生提供基本技能。该计划包括在社区中进行实地学习,大部分实地工作在泰国东北部。因此,对邻国的了解非常有限。金边皇家大学的学生正在攻读环境科学的本科学位。该计划主要侧重于与自然资源和环境管理有关的跨学科领域内的课堂教学。基于现场的学习具有不计学分的补充课程的地位。因此,在所有这三种情况下,课堂外和国情之外的学习机会都是有限的。跨境研究交流在两个主要方面是创新的。首先,这是湄公河学习倡议的一项中心活动,这是在湄公河五个县的八所大学中在环境,自然资源管理和农村社会变革等相关领域发展师生之间的实践性合作的首次重大尝试。其次,通过开发我们称为跨领域的方法,它挑战了传统的以教师为中心的课堂学习

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号