首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Human Sciences and Extension >Quantitative or Qualitative: Selecting the Right Methodological Approach for Credible Evidence
【24h】

Quantitative or Qualitative: Selecting the Right Methodological Approach for Credible Evidence

机译:定量或定性:选择正确的方法论方法来获得可信的证据

获取原文

摘要

This article provides insight into how an adequate approach to selecting methods can establish credible and actionable evidence. The authors offer strategies to effectively support Extension professionals, including program developers and evaluators, in being more deliberate when selecting appropriate qualitative and quantitative methods. In addition, several examples of commonly used measures are described to help in determining their applicability for evaluating Extension programs. Benefits and challenges of select methods are discussed as well as pitfalls to avoid that can derail the evaluative process. Lastly, a few cases are shared to present how Extension is aiming to establish credible evidence through state efforts and at the national level. The authors discuss the use of practical designs (e.g., common measures) that offer a more uniform way of evaluating programs. Examples are also included to highlight the effective use of Extension reporting systems that aim to streamline data collection, evaluation, and reporting as a means to ensure more credibility.
机译:本文提供了有关选择方法的适当方法如何建立可信且可操作的证据的见解。作者提供了有效地支持扩展专业人员(包括程序开发人员和评估人员)选择合适的定性和定量方法时应谨慎使用的策略。此外,还介绍了几个常用措施的示例,以帮助确定它们在评估扩展程序中的适用性。讨论了选择方法的好处和挑战,以及避免的陷阱,以免影响评估过程。最后,分享了一些案例,以介绍扩展计划如何通过国家和国家层面的努力来建立可靠的证据。作者讨论了实用设计(例如通用措施)的使用,这些实用设计提供了更统一的评估程序的方式。还包括了一些示例,以突出有效地使用扩展报告系统,这些系统旨在简化数据收集,评估和报告,以确保更高的可信度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号