首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Forest Science >Comparison of Three Methods to Determine Optimal Road Spacing for Forwarder-type Logging Operations
【24h】

Comparison of Three Methods to Determine Optimal Road Spacing for Forwarder-type Logging Operations

机译:确定转发器式测井作业的最佳道路间距的三种方法的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Optimum road spacing (ORS) of forwarding operation in Styria in Southern Austria is studied in this paper. In a harvesting operation it is important to compute the ORS to minimize the total cost of harvesting and roading. The aim of this study was a comparison of different methods to study ORS. Data from 82 cycles were used to develop two models for predicting the cycle time using statistical analysis of a time study data base. The ORS was computed by three methods including Matthews’ formula (1942), Sundberg’s method (1976), and the two statistical models for predicting the cycle time. The results gave the ORS for one-way forwarding using Matthew’s formula as 1,969 m, Sund-berg’s model as 394.4 m, and the two time study models as 463 and 909 m. The analysis of forwarding data indicated that the speed was related to a distance which contributed to the difference between models and that the loading and unloading time may be related to one or several other study variables.
机译:本文研究了奥地利南部施蒂里亚州的最佳转发运输间隔(ORS)。在收割作业中,重要的是计算ORS,以最大程度地减少收割和铺路的总成本。本研究的目的是比较研究ORS的不同方法。来自82个周期的数据用于开发两个模型,这些模型使用时间研究数据库的统计分析来预测周期时间。 ORS是通过三种方法计算的,包括Matthews公式(1942),Sundberg方法(1976)和两个用于预测周期的统计模型。结果提供了ORS进行单向转发的ORS,其使用的Matthew公式为1,969 m,Sund-berg模型为394.4 m,两次研究模型为463和909 m。对转发数据的分析表明,速度与距离有关,而距离与模型之间的差异有关,并且装卸时间可能与一个或几个其他研究变量有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号