首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Equine Science >Comparison of commercial RNA extraction kits and qPCR master mixes for studying gene expression in small biopsy tissue samples from the equine gastric epithelium
【24h】

Comparison of commercial RNA extraction kits and qPCR master mixes for studying gene expression in small biopsy tissue samples from the equine gastric epithelium

机译:比较用于研究马胃上皮小活检组织样品中基因表达的商业RNA提取试剂盒和qPCR预混液的比较

获取原文
       

摘要

Gastric tissue biopsy and gene expression analysis are important tools for disease diagnosis and study of the physiology of the equine stomach. However, RNA extraction from gastric biopsy samples is a complex procedure because the samples contain low quantities of RNA and are contaminated with mucous protein and bacterial flora. The objectives of these studies were to compare the performance of RNA extraction methods and to investigate the sensitivity of commercial qPCR master mixes for gene expression analysis of gastric biopsy samples. Three commercial RNA extraction methods (TRIzolTM, GENEzolTM and MiniPrepTM) and four qPCR master mixes with SYBR? green (qPCRBIO, KAPA, QuantiNova, and PerfeCTa) were compared. RNA qualification and quantitation were compared. Real-time PCR was used to compare qPCR master mixes. The results revealed that TRIzol and GENEzol obtained significantly higher yield of RNA (P
机译:胃组织活检和基因表达分析是疾病诊断和研究马胃生理的重要工具。但是,从胃活检样品中提取RNA是一个复杂的过程,因为样品中RNA含量低,并被粘液蛋白和细菌菌群污染。这些研究的目的是比较RNA提取方法的性能,并研究商业qPCR预混液对胃活检样品的基因表达分析的敏感性。三种商业RNA提取方法(TRIzol TM ,GENEzol TM 和MiniPrep TM )和四种qPCR主混合物与SYBR ?比较了绿色(qPCRBIO,KAPA,QuantiNova和PerfeCTa)。比较了RNA鉴定和定量。使用实时PCR比较qPCR预混液。结果显示TRIzol和GENEzol获得了显着更高的RNA产量(P

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号