...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering >An integrated methodology for establishing industrial effluent limits in developing countries: Iran as a case study
【24h】

An integrated methodology for establishing industrial effluent limits in developing countries: Iran as a case study

机译:建立发展中国家工业废水排放限制的综合方法:以伊朗为例

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BackgroundEnvironmental policies should be developed in a contextual decision-making process regarding local environmental concerns emphasizing the economic, technical, social and institutional considerations. Establishing emission limit levels, especially in the industrial sector, is one of the most problematic environmental issues in developing countries, for which it is essential to include several criteria that reflect their country-specific constraints and capacities. Since Best Available Technology (BAT) is acknowledged to be the reference element for sustainable development and a basis for Emissions Limit Values (ELVs), the objective of this study is to present a reliable methodology for establishing ELVs thresholds with an emphasis on the BAT concept for national regulation at the sector level. MethodsA hybrid fuzzy multiple-criteria decision-making (FMCDM) process, consisting of the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and fuzzy Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (fuzzy TOPSIS) method, is structured to aggregate the different criteria and rank different ELV alternatives in this complicated evaluation. In order to use the most profound knowledge and judgment of a professional expert team, this qualitative assessment highlights the importance of supportive information. ResultsThe results obtained indicate that experts have considered the country-specific information as a reliable reference in their decisions. Among different key evaluation criteria in effluent standard setting, the highest experts’ priority is “Environmental protection”. For both the conventional and toxic pollutants, the influence of all other criteria namely “Economic feasibility”, “Technology viability” and “Institutional capacity”, as constraining criteria in developing countries, have not reduced the responsibility towards the environmental objectives. In ELVs ranking, experts have made their decisions with respect to the specific characteristics of each pollutant and the existing capacities and constraints of the country, without emphasizing on any specific reference. ConclusionsThis systematic and transparent approach has resulted in defensible country-specific ELVs for the Iron and Steel industry, which can be developed for other sectors. As the main conclusion, this paper demonstrates that FMCDM is a robust tool for this comprehensive assessment especially regarding the data availability limitations in developing countries.
机译:背景技术应在有关地方环境问题的背景决策过程中制定环境政策,强调经济,技术,社会和体制方面的考虑。建立排放限值水平,特别是在工业部门中,是发展中国家最棘手的环境问题之一,为此必须纳入反映其国家特定约束和能力的若干标准。由于公认最佳可行技术(BAT)是可持续发展的参考要素和排放限值(ELV)的基础,因此本研究的目的是提出一种建立ELV阈值的可靠方法,重点放在BAT概念上用于部门层面的国家监管。方法构建混合模糊多准则决策(FMCDM)过程,该过程由层次分析法(AHP)和基于与理想解决方案相似性的优先顺序模糊技术(模糊TOPSIS)组成,以汇总不同的准则和等级在这种复杂的评估中使用不同的ELV替代方案。为了利用专业专家团队的最深刻的知识和判断力,此定性评估突出了支持性信息的重要性。结果获得的结果表明,专家们在决定中已经将国别信息视为可靠的参考。在废水标准制定的不同关键评估标准中,专家的最高优先级是“环境保护”。对于常规污染物和有毒污染物,作为发展中国家的限制标准,所有其他标准(即“经济可行性”,“技术可行性”和“机构能力”)的影响并未降低对环境目标的责任。在ELV的排名中,专家在确定每种污染物的特定特征以及该国的现有容量和限制方面做出了决定,而没有强调任何具体参考。结论这种系统和透明的方法已为钢铁行业开发了可辩护的针对特定国家的ELV,可以为其他行业开发这种ELV。作为主要结论,本文证明FMCDM是进行全面评估的强大工具,尤其是在发展中国家的数据可用性限制方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号