首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Contemporary Brachytherapy >Combined external beam radiotherapy and vaginal brachytherapy versus vaginal brachytherapy in stage I, intermediate- and high-risk cases of endometrium carcinoma
【24h】

Combined external beam radiotherapy and vaginal brachytherapy versus vaginal brachytherapy in stage I, intermediate- and high-risk cases of endometrium carcinoma

机译:子宫内膜癌I期,中危和高危病例联合外照射与阴道近距离放射治疗与阴道近距离放射治疗

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose Randomized trials on the effect of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) for endometrial carcinoma are very few. In view of this, the current study was conducted with the hypothesizes: whether the escalated dose of 26 Gy (VBT alone) in comparison with various major international trials (PORTEC-2) has any difference in rates of disease-free and overall survival with fewer adverse effects in low resource setting like India. Material and methods An open-labeled, non-inferiority, randomized control trial was undertaken at a regional cancer center among patients with stage IA or IB high-intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma. A total of 50 patients were divided equally among two arms of combined EBRT with VBT (arm I) and VBT alone (arm II). A dose of 50-50.4 Gy in 25-28 fractions of EBRT with 2 fractions of VBT 6.5 Gy each were delivered to patients in arm I and 4 fractions of VBT 6.5 Gy each to patients in arm II, and were followed up for 60 months. Results During the median follow-up of 36.5 months, two patients developed loco-regional recurrence in arm II, three (arm II), and one (arm I) developed distant metastasis. The 5-year survival rates for arms I and II were 96.0% vs. 92.0% overall, and 88.0% vs. 84.0% disease-free, respectively, and were not found to be statistically significantly different. Dermatological, gastro-intestinal toxicities, and cystitis were lower in the VBT group compared to combined group. Conclusions VBT alone is as effective as EBRT+VBT in ensuring loco-regional control and achieving comparable survival rates, with fewer toxic effects for patients with stage I intermediate- and high-risk endometrial carcinoma. The dose escalation did not make a difference in the survival rates and was like in the other major trials (PORTEC-2).
机译:目的很少有关于伴有或不伴有阴道近距离放射治疗(VBT)的子宫内膜癌放射线放射治疗(EBRT)效果的随机试验。有鉴于此,当前的研究是基于以下假设进行的:与各种主要国际试验(PORTEC-2)相比,递增剂量的26 Gy(仅VBT)在无病生存率和总体生存率方面是否存在差异在资源匮乏的环境(如印度)中,不良影响减少材料和方法在IA或IB期高中危子宫内膜癌患者中,在区域癌症中心进行了一项开放性,非劣效,随机对照试验。共有50例患者平均分为合并EBRT与VBT的两个组(第一组)和单独的VBT(第二组)。将25-28份EBRT中的50-50.4 Gy剂量以及2份VBT 6.5 Gy的成分分别送给I组患者,将4部分VBT 6.5 Gy的剂量分别给予I组的患者,并随访60个月。结果在36.5个月的中位随访期间,两名患者在II组发生局部复发,三名(II组)和一名(I组)发生远处转移。 I和II组的5年生存率分别为96.0%和92.0%,以及88.0%和84.0%无疾病,并且在统计学上没有显着差异。与联合治疗组相比,VBT组的皮肤病学,胃肠道毒性和膀胱炎较低。结论单独的VBT与EBRT + VBT在确保局部区域控制和达到相当的生存率方面一样有效,并且对I期中高危子宫内膜癌患者的毒副作用较小。剂量增加并没有改变存活率,就像其他主要试验(PORTEC-2)一样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号