首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care >Qatar ambulance service and Hamad General Hospital Emergency Department staff's perception of current patient handover practice
【24h】

Qatar ambulance service and Hamad General Hospital Emergency Department staff's perception of current patient handover practice

机译:卡塔尔救护车服务和哈马德综合医院急诊科工作人员对当前患者移交做法的看法

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The handover process is meant to ensure patient safety and maintain continuity of care through endorsement of critical patient information. This study evaluates staff's perceptions about the current patient handover process effectiveness between Ambulance Service (AS) and Emergency Department (ED) clinicians. It may help identify barriers and contributing factors to an effective patient handover. Methods: An electronic questionnaire was circulated to all ED doctorsurses and AS staff (Estimated N?=?1,000). 400 questionnaires were completed of which 92 did not meet the inclusion criteria. Respondents were 43% AS staff, 29% ED nurses, and 28% ED doctors. A 4-point Likert scale (1?=?strongly disagree-4?=?strongly agree) was used. The mean was calculated for every variable to determine each group perception. One-way ANOVA tested the relationship between demographics and perceptions’ variables. Results: Although 62% of respondents believe the current handover process is safe and 65% believe AS staff report all critical information, 70% of respondents think that it causes AS/ED staff conflicts, and 72% believe the current handover process needs changing. ANOVA test revealed significant differences in the mean between study groups’ handover safety perceptions. Interestingly, ED nurses expressed more safety concern (2.43) than ED doctors (2.58) and AS staff (2.82) with p-value
机译:背景:移交过程旨在通过认可重要的患者信息来确保患者安全并保持护理的连续性。这项研究评估了工作人员对救护车(AS)和急诊科(ED)临床医生之间当前患者移交过程有效性的看法。它可能有助于确定阻碍患者有效移交的障碍和影响因素。方法:向所有急诊医生/护士和AS员工分发电子问卷(估计N = 1000)。已完成400份问卷,其中92份不符合纳入标准。受访者为43%的AS员工,29%的ED护士和28%的ED医生。使用4点李克特量表(1?=?非常不同意4?=?非常同意)。计算每个变量的平均值,以确定每个小组的看法。单向方差分析测试了人口统计数据与感知变量之间的关系。结果:尽管62%的受访者认为当前移交过程是安全的,而65%的受访者认为AS员工报告了所有关键信息,但70%的受访者认为这会导致AS / ED员工冲突,而72%的受访者认为当前移交是安全的过程需要改变。方差分析(ANOVA)测试显示,研究组的移交安全感之间的均值存在显着差异。有趣的是,ED护士比ED医生(2.58)和AS员工(2.82)对安全性的担忧(2.43)多,p值<?0.05。有效切换的主要障碍是:缺乏切换协议(89%);缺乏标准化的切换工具(89%);零散的沟通(85%);和频繁中断(82%)。 93%的受访者认为,尽管67%的受访者不知道任何标准化的切换工具,但使用标准化的切换工具将改善患者的切换过程。结论:缺乏移交协议和标准化工具会导致重大变化,并且由于可能丢失关键信息而引起患者安全问题。我们相信,像ISBAR这样的共同商定的标准化移交工具将减少移交变化并确保质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号