首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Enam Medical College >Comparison of Intra-Operative and Post-Operative Complications between Non-Descent Vaginal Hysterectomy and Total Abdominal Hysterectomy
【24h】

Comparison of Intra-Operative and Post-Operative Complications between Non-Descent Vaginal Hysterectomy and Total Abdominal Hysterectomy

机译:非下降性阴道子宫切除术和全腹子宫切除术的术中和术后并发症的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background : Hysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed by the gynaecologists and can be done through abdominal and vaginal routes. Vaginal hysterectomy technique has been introduced and performed centuries back, but is less popular due to lack of experience and misconception that the abdominal route is easier and safer. Worldwide gynaecologists continue to use abdominal route for hysterectomy that could be performed vaginally which is less invasive and has minimal complications. Objective : To compare the complications during intra-operative and post-operative period between vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in non-descent uterus. Materials and Methods : This prospective randomised study was performed in Enam Medical College & Hospital, Savar, Dhaka during a period of one year. Sixty consecutive patients requiring hysterectomy for benign diseases were included in this study. Group A (n=30) underwent vaginal hysterectomy (non-descent vaginal hysterectomy) and were compared with Group B (n=30) who underwent abdominal hysterectomy. The primary outcome measures were operative time, intra-operative blood loss, post-operative complications like wound infection, febrile morbidity, post-operative systemic infection and hospital stay. Secondary outcome measures were conversion of vaginal to abdominal route and re-laparotomy. Data were collected in structured questionnaire and analysed by computer using R programming version 3.4.3. Results : Baseline characteristics were similar in two groups. There were no intra-operative complications in either group. Intra-operative blood loss was significantly more in Group B than in Group A. The overall complication rate was significantly higher with abdominal hysterectomy with a rate of 56.67% against 30% for vaginal hysterectomy. Wound infection (23.33%) was significantly higher in Group B as compared to Group A (0%). Post-operative hospital stay was significantly higher in Group B (7.03 days) than in Group A (4.57 days). Conclusion : Considering intra-operative blood loss, post-operative complications and hospital stay, vaginal route was found safer than abdominal route in this study. J Enam Med Col 2018; 8(3): 128-134.
机译:背景:子宫切除术是妇科医生最常用的外科手术之一,可以通过腹部和阴道途径进行。阴道子宫切除术已被引入并在数百年以前进行过,但由于缺乏经验和对腹部途径更容易,更安全的误解而受到欢迎。世界范围内的妇科医生继续使用腹部途径进行子宫切除术,这可以通过阴道进行,这是侵入性较小并且并发症最少的方法。目的:比较非血统子宫阴道全子宫切除术和腹部全子宫切除术的术中及术后并发症。材料和方法:这项前瞻性随机研究是在Enam医学院和美国医学会进行的。达卡萨瓦尔医院,为期一年。本研究包括连续60例因良性疾病而需要行子宫切除术的患者。 A组(n = 30)行阴道子宫切除术(非下降性阴道子宫切除术),并与B组(n = 30)行腹部子宫切除术进行比较。主要预后指标为手术时间,术中失血,术后并发症如伤口感染,高热发病率,术后全身感染和住院时间。次要结局指标为阴道转腹和再次开腹手术。在结构化问卷中收集数据,并使用R编程版本3.4.3通过计算机进行分析。结果:两组的基线特征相似。两组均无术中并发症发生。 B组的术中失血明显多于A组。腹部子宫切除术的总体并发症发生率显着更高,发生率为56.67%,而阴道子宫切除术的发生率为30%。与A组(0%)相比,B组的伤口感染(23.33%)显着更高。 B组(7.03天)的术后住院时间显着高于A组(4.57天)。结论:考虑到术中失血,术后并发症和住院时间,本研究发现阴道途径比腹部途径更安全。 J Enam Med Col 2018; 8(3):128-134。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号