首页> 外文期刊>Journal of diabetes research. >Diagnostic Accuracy of Monofilament Tests for Detecting Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Diagnostic Accuracy of Monofilament Tests for Detecting Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:检测糖尿病周围神经病变的单丝试验的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective. To systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods. We searched EMBASE (OvidSP), MEDLINE (OvidSP), the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify diagnostic accuracy trials of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy. We used a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) model to conduct the meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Results. A total of 19 comparative trials met the inclusion criteria and were part of the qualitative synthesis. Eight trials using nerve conduction studies as the reference standard were selected for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy were 0.53 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32 to 0.74) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.94), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 4.56 (95% CI 2.93 to 7.10) and 0.53 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.81), respectively. Conclusions. Our review indicated that monofilament tests had limited sensitivity for screening diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The clinical use of the monofilament test in the evaluation of diabetic peripheral neuropathy cannot be encouraged based on currently available evidence.
机译:目的。为了系统地评估单丝测试对糖尿病周围神经病变的诊断准确性。方法。我们搜索了EMBASE(OvidSP),MEDLINE(OvidSP),Cochrane库和Web of Science,以确定用于检测糖尿病性周围神经病变的单丝试验的诊断准确性试验。我们使用分层汇总接收器操作特征(HSROC)模型进行单丝测试诊断准确性的荟萃分析,以检测糖尿病周围神经病变。结果。共有19项比较试验符合纳入标准,并且是定性综合研究的一部分。选择八项以神经传导研究为参考标准的试验进行荟萃分析。用于检测糖尿病周围神经病变的单丝试验的合并敏感性和特异性分别为0.53(95%置信区间(CI)0.32至0.74)和0.88(95%CI 0.78至0.94)。合并的正似然比和负似然比分别为4.56(95%CI为2.93至7.10)和0.53(95%CI为0.35至0.81)。结论。我们的审查表明,单丝测试筛查糖尿病周围神经病变的敏感性有限。基于目前可获得的证据,不能鼓励单丝试验在糖尿病周围神经病变的评估中的临床应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号