...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of diabetes research. >Diagnostic Accuracy of Monofilament Tests for Detecting Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
【24h】

Diagnostic Accuracy of Monofilament Tests for Detecting Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

机译:检测糖尿病外周神经病变检测单丝试验的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Objective. To systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Methods. We searched EMBASE (OvidSP), MEDLINE (OvidSP), the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify diagnostic accuracy trials of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy. We used a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics (HSROC) model to conduct the meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Results. A total of 19 comparative trials met the inclusion criteria and were part of the qualitative synthesis. Eight trials using nerve conduction studies as the reference standard were selected for the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of monofilament tests for detecting diabetic peripheral neuropathy were 0.53 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32 to 0.74) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.94), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 4.56 (95% CI 2.93 to 7.10) and 0.53 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.81), respectively. Conclusions. Our review indicated that monofilament tests had limited sensitivity for screening diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The clinical use of the monofilament test in the evaluation of diabetic peripheral neuropathy cannot be encouraged based on currently available evidence.
机译:客观的。系统地评估检测糖尿病外周神经病变的单丝试验的诊断准确性。方法。我们搜索了Embase(OVIDSP),MEDLINE(OVIDSP),Cochrane库和科学网,以确定用于检测糖尿病外周神经病变的单丝测试的诊断准确性试验。我们使用了分层摘要接收器操作特性(HSROC)模型来进行单丝检测诊断准确性的荟萃分析,用于检测糖尿病外周神经病变。结果。共有19项比较试验符合纳入标准,是定性合成的一部分。选择使用神经传导研究作为参考标准的八项试验进行荟萃分析。用于检测糖尿病外周神经病变的单丝测试的汇集灵敏度和单丝测试的特异性分别为0.53(95%置信区间(CI)0.32至0.74),分别为0.88(95%CI 0.78至0.94)。汇集的正似然比和负似然比分别为4.56(95%CI 2.93至7.10)和0.53(95%CI 0.35至0.81)。结论。我们的评论表明,单丝测试对筛选糖尿病外周神经病变具有有限的灵敏度。根据目前可用的证据,不能鼓励单丝试验在评估糖尿病外周神经病变中的临床应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号