首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Conservative Dentistry >Comparison and evaluation of two reciprocating root canal instruments on removal of smear layer by using two irrigants at apical one-third of the root canal-an ex vivo-scanning electron microscopic study
【24h】

Comparison and evaluation of two reciprocating root canal instruments on removal of smear layer by using two irrigants at apical one-third of the root canal-an ex vivo-scanning electron microscopic study

机译:比较和评价两种往复式根管器械在根管根尖的三分之一处使用两种冲洗液去除污渍层的效果-体外扫描电子显微镜研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: To compare and evaluate the cleaning ability of two reciprocating systems, that is, WaveOne (WO) and self-adjusting files (SAF) in terms of removal of smear layer using sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) at apical one-third of the root canal. Materials and Methods: Forty-three human maxillary anterior teeth were selected. The canal was instrumented manually up to a number 25 K-file size. WO and SAF were used to prepare the root canals. The following groups were studied: Group 1 using WO:-Group 1a = 5% NaOCl + 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), Group 1b = 2% CHX + 17% EDTA, Group 2 using SAF:-Group 2a = 5% NaOCl + 17% EDTA, Group 2b = 2% CHX + 17% EDTA. All roots were split longitudinally and subjected to scanning electron microscopic. The presence of smear layer apical thirds was evaluated using a 5-score evaluation system. Chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis. Results: The results showed no significant difference in smear layer removal among both reciprocating system and among the irrigants. Group 2a exhibited the best results and was close to significant difference in score ( P > 0.05). The NaOCl + EDTA solution used in Group 1a and Group 2a could effectively remove the smear layer in most of the specimens. However, SAF was more effective than WO in the apical third of the canal. Conclusion: The results obtained from the present study suggest that using the SAF system and continuous irrigation action with NaOCl and EDTA solution could overcome the difficulty of removing smear layer even in hard-to-reach regions of the root canal.
机译:目的:比较和评估两个往复运动系统,即WaveOne(WO)和自调节锉刀(SAF)在顶端使用次氯酸钠(NaOCl)和葡萄糖酸氯己定(CHX)去除污渍层的清洁能力根管的三分之一。材料和方法:选择43例人类上颌前牙。手动对运河进行插管,最大锉刀尺寸为25K。用WO和SAF制备根管。研究了以下各组:使用WO的第1组:-第1a组= 5%NaOCl + 17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA),第1b组= 2%CHX + 17%EDTA,使用SAF的第2组:-第2a组= 5%NaOCl + 17%EDTA,2b组= 2%CHX + 17%EDTA。将所有根纵向切开并进行扫描电子显微镜观察。使用5分评估系统评估涂片层顶端三分之一的存在。卡方检验用于统计分析。结果:结果表明,往复系统和冲洗液之间的污迹层去除率无显着差异。 2a组表现最好,得分接近显着差异(P> 0.05)。第1a组和第2a组中使用的NaOCl + EDTA溶液可以有效去除大多数标本中的涂片层。但是,SAF在根管的三分之一处比WO更为有效。结论:从本研究中获得的结果表明,使用SAF系统以及用NaOCl和EDTA溶液进行连续冲洗动作,即使在根管难以到达的区域,也可以克服去除污迹层的困难。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号