...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Conservative Dentistry >A comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by using ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, citric acid, and maleic acid as root canal irrigants: An in vitro scanning electron microscopic study
【24h】

A comparative evaluation of smear layer removal by using ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid, citric acid, and maleic acid as root canal irrigants: An in vitro scanning electron microscopic study

机译:用乙二胺四乙酸,柠檬酸和马来酸作为根管灌溉剂的涂抹层去除的比较评价:体外扫描电子显微镜研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: Irrigants remove or dissolve smear layer formed during instrumentation. Thus it is important to study the effect of different irrigant solutions on smear layer removal. Objectives: The aim of this study is to determine which irrigant effectively removes the smear layer from the coronal, middle, and apical third of the root canal. Materials and Methodology: One hundred and twenty single-rooted mandibular premolars were decoronated and biomechanical preparation was done through hand instrumentation up to size 40 k file with 2.5% NaOCl irrigation between each successive filing, followed by irrigation with 5 ml of saline. The teeth were divided into Groups I, II, III, and IV containing 30 samples each and irrigated with 5 ml of 17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA), 10% Citric acid, 7% Maleic acid and normal saline respectively for 1 min and final irrigation was done with 5 ml of distilled water of each sample. The canals were dried with 2% absorbent paper points. The roots were then split with a chisel and mallet. One-half of each tooth was selected and then was analyzed using a scanning electron microscope. The dentinal surfaces were observed at the cervical, middle, and apical third with ×2000 for the smear layer. The scores were attributed, according to Torabinejad et al . rating system. Results: 7% maleic acid and 10% citric acid both are equally effective in smear layer removal from coronal and middle third, but in apical third 7% maleic acid is more effective than 10% citric acid. Between citric acid and EDTA, both are equally effective in smear layer removal from coronal and middle third, but in apical third, 10% citric acid is more efficacious than 17% EDTA. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the study, it can be concluded that all three tested irrigants removed the smear layer from coronal, middle, and apical third. However, in apical third 7% maleic acid is the most efficacious irrigant in smear layer removal.
机译:介绍:洗印剂去除或溶解在仪器期间形成的涂片层。因此,重要的是研究不同洗印剂溶液对涂抹层去除的影响。目的:本研究的目的是确定哪些灌溉用品有效地从根管的冠状动物,中间和顶端三分之一中去除涂片层。材料和方法:通过手工仪器仪器仪器仪器仪器仪器仪器仪器进行了一百二十个单生根颌骨磨牙,每次连续备料之间的灌溉2.5%的NIOCL灌溉,然后用5毫升盐水灌溉。将牙齿分成含有30个样品的I,II,III和IV,每个样品,分别用5ml 17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA),10%柠檬酸,7%的马来酸和生理盐水浸泡1分钟,用每个样品的5ml蒸馏水进行最终灌溉。用2%的吸收纸点干燥运河。然后用凿子和槌分裂。选择每个牙齿的一半,然后使用扫描电子显微镜进行分析。在颈椎,中间和顶端第三,用×2000的涂抹层观察牙本质表面。根据Torabinejad等人的说法,分数归因于此。评分系统。结果:7%马来酸和10%柠檬酸两者在冠状和中间三分之一的涂片层中同样有效,但在顶端第三7%的马来酸中比10%柠檬酸更有效。在柠檬酸和EDTA之间,两者都同样有效地从冠状和中间排出的涂片层去除,但在顶端基准中,10%柠檬酸比17%EDTA更有效。结论:在研究的局限内,可以得出结论,所有三种测试的灌溉剂从冠状,中间和顶端第三次取出涂片层。然而,在顶端第三,7%的马来酸是涂片层中最有效的灌溉剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号