首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Medicine Research >Intermittent Auscultation in Labor: Could It Be Missing Many Pathological (Late) Fetal Heart Rate Decelerations? Analytical Review and Rationale for Improvement Supported by Clinical Cases
【24h】

Intermittent Auscultation in Labor: Could It Be Missing Many Pathological (Late) Fetal Heart Rate Decelerations? Analytical Review and Rationale for Improvement Supported by Clinical Cases

机译:间歇性听诊:是否会错过许多病理性(晚期)胎儿心率减慢?临床案例支持的分析审查和改进理由

获取原文

摘要

Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate (FHR) is recommended/preferred in low risk labors. Its usage even in developed countries is poised to increase because of perceived benefit of reduction in operative intervention and some disillusionment with the cardiotocography (CTG). Many national guidelines have stipulated regimes (frequency/timing) of IA based on level IV evidence. These tend to get faithfully and exactingly followed. It was observed that deliveries of many unexpectedly asphyxiated infants occurred despite rigorously performed and documented IA compliant with the guidelines. This triggered a reappraisal of the robustness of IA leading to this focused review supplemented by two anonymized cases. It concludes that the current methodology of IA may be flawed in that it poses a risk of missing many or most late (pathological) FHR decelerations, one of the foremost goals of IA. This is because many late decelerations reach their nadir before the end of the contraction. Thus the currently recommended auscultation of FHR for 60 seconds after the contraction by all national guidelines seemed to encompass their “recovery” phase and appeared to be misinterpreted as normal FHR or even as a reassuring accelerative pattern in the clinical practice. A recent recommendation of recording of the FHR as a single figure (rather than a range) does not remedy this anomaly and seems even less informative. It would be better to auscultate FHR before and after the contractions (or contraction to contraction) and take the FHR just before the contraction as the baseline FHR and interpret the FHR after contraction in the context of this baseline. This relatively simple improvement would detect most late FHR decelerations thus ameliorating the risk and significantly enhancing the patient safety.J Clin Med Res. 2015;7(12):919-925doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2298w
机译:推荐/最好在低危劳动中使用间歇性听诊(IA)胎儿心率(FHR)。由于减少了手术干预以及心电图术(CTG)带来的幻灭感,人们甚至认为在发达国家使用它的可能性将会增加。许多国家指南都基于IV级证据规定了IA的机制(频率/定时)。这些往往会得到忠实和严格的遵循。据观察,尽管严格执行并记录了符合指南的IA,但仍有许多意外窒息的婴儿分娩。这引发了对IA健壮性的重新评估,从而导致了这次重点审核,并辅以两个匿名案例。结论认为,IA的当前方法可能有缺陷,因为它可能会丢失许多或大多数(病理性)FHR减速度,这是IA的首要目标之一。这是因为许多后期减速都在收缩结束之前达到最低点。因此,目前所有建议的国家指南都建议在收缩后60秒内对FHR进行听诊,似乎涵盖了它们的“恢复”阶段,并且在临床实践中似乎被误解为正常FHR或什至是令人放心的加速模式。最近建议将FHR记录为一个数字(而不是一个范围)不能纠正这种异常现象,并且提供的信息甚至更少。最好在收缩前后(或收缩至收缩)听诊FHR,并以收缩前的FHR作为基线FHR,并在此基线的背景下解释FHR。这种相对简单的改进将检测出大多数晚期FHR减速度,从而降低了风险并显着提高了患者的安全性。 2015; 7(12):919-925doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2298w

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号