首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics >Comparison between ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency and microwave ablation in benign thyroid nodules
【24h】

Comparison between ultrasound-guided percutaneous radiofrequency and microwave ablation in benign thyroid nodules

机译:超声引导下经皮射频和微波消融治疗甲状腺良性结节的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and microwave ablation (MWA) for the treatment of benign thyroid nodules (BTNs). Methods: Patients with BTNs were treated in our hospital, including 72 patients treated with RFA and 100 patients treated with MWA from June 2016 to March 2019. The volume reduction rates (VRRs), thyroid function, clinical status, and complications were compared at each postoperative duration to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the two modalities. Results: The mean VRRs of the RFA group vs. the MWA group at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 22.7±13.4% vs. 24.0±16.1% (P = 0.681), 56.1±19.5% vs. 54.8±22.8% (P = 0.788), 77.9±21.0% vs. 68.7±19.1% (P = 0.038), and 85.4±18.9% vs. 75.8±19.4% (P = 0.029), respectively. There was no significant difference in the VRRs between the two treatments at 1 and 3 months and the RFA group achieved higher VRRs than MWA group at 6 and 12 months. Moreover, the symptom and cosmetic scores decreased significantly in both groups and all patients succeeded in preserving thyroid function. Of the total patients, 2.8% in the RFA group and 4% in the MWA group experienced voice changes after undergoing thyroid ablation, and one patient in the RFA group had intraoperative hemorrhage of about 10 mL. Conclusions: RFA and MWA are both effective and safe techniques for treating BTNs. Higher VRRs were observed at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups in the RFA group.
机译:目的:本研究的目的是比较射频消融(RFA)和微波消融(MWA)治疗甲状腺良性结节(BTN)的有效性和安全性。方法:我院自2016年6月至2019年3月收治BTN患者,其中RFA治疗72例,MWA治疗100例。比较各组的降容率(VRRs),甲状腺功能,临床状况及并发症。术后持续时间以评估两种方式的疗效和安全性。结果:RFA组与MWA组在第1、3、6和12个月的平均VRR为22.7±13.4%对24.0±16.1%(P = 0.681),56.1±19.5%对54.8±22.8百分比(P = 0.788),77.9±21.0%和68.7±19.1%(P = 0.038)和85.4±18.9%和75.8±19.4%(P = 0.029)。两种治疗在1和3个月时的VRR没有显着差异,RFA组在6和12个月时获得了比MWA组更高的VRR。此外,两组的症状和美容评分均显着降低,所有患者均成功保留了甲状腺功能。在全部患者中,RFA组的2.8%和MWA组的4%在接受甲状腺消融后出现了声音变化,RFA组的一名患者术中出血量约为10 mL。结论:RFA和MWA都是治疗BTN的有效且安全的技术。在RFA组的6个月和12个月的随访中观察到较高的VRR。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号