...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics >Dosimetric verification of brain and head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment using EDR2 films and 2D ion chamber array matrix
【24h】

Dosimetric verification of brain and head and neck intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment using EDR2 films and 2D ion chamber array matrix

机译:使用EDR2膜和2D离子室阵列矩阵进行脑和头颈部强度调制放射治疗的剂量学验证

获取原文

摘要

Background: The evaluation of the agreement between measured and calculated dose plays an essential role in the quality assurance (QA) procedures of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Aim: The purpose of this study is to compare performances of the two dosimetric systems (EDR2 and I'matriXX) in the verification of the dose distributions calculated by the TPS for brain and head and neck dynamic IMRT cases. Materials and Methods: The comparison of cumulative fluence by using Kodak extended dose rate (EDR2) and I'matriXX detectors has been done for the evaluation of 10 brain, 10 head and neck IMRT cases treated with 6 MV beams. The parameter used to assess the quality of dose calculation is the gamma-index (g -index) method. The acceptance limits for g calculation we have used are 3% and 3 mm respectively for dose agreement and distance to agreement parameters. Statistical analyses were performed by using the paired, two-tailed Student t-test, and P Results: The qualitative dose distribution comparison was performed using composite dose distribution in the measurement plane and profiles along various axes for TPS vs. EDR2 film and TPS Vs I'matriXX. The quantitative analysis between the calculated and measured dose distribution was evaluated using DTA and g-index. The percentage of pixels matching with the set DTA and g values are comparable for both with EDR2 film and I'matriXX array detectors. Statistically there was no significant variation observed between EDR2 film and I'matriXX in terms of the mean percentage of pixel passing g for brain cases (98.77 ± 1.03 vs 97.62 ± 1.66, P = 0.0218) and for head and neck cases (97.39 ± 2.13 vs 97.17 ± 1.52%, P = 0.7404). Conclusion: Due to simplicity and fast evaluation process of array detectors, it can be routinely used in busy departments without compromising the measurement accuracy.
机译:背景:评估剂量与计算剂量之间的一致性在强度调节放射治疗(IMRT)的质量保证(QA)程序中起着至关重要的作用。目的:本研究的目的是比较两种剂量系统(EDR2和I'matriXX)在验证TPS计算的脑部和头颈部动态IMRT病例剂量分布方面的性能。材料和方法:已经通过使用柯达扩展剂量率(EDR2)和I'matriXX检测器对累积通量进行了比较,以评估10例大脑,10例头部和颈部IMRT病例接受6束MV射线治疗的情况。用于评估剂量计算质量的参数是伽玛指数(g-index)方法。对于剂量一致性和距离一致性参数,我们使用的g计算的可接受极限分别为3%和3 mm。使用配对的两尾学生t检验和P结果进行统计分析:定性剂量分布比较是使用测量平面中的复合剂量分布以及沿着TPS对比EDR2膜和TPS Vs沿各个轴的剖面进行的我是matriXX。使用DTA和g-index评估计算和测量的剂量分布之间的定量分析。对于EDR2胶片和I'matriXX阵列检测器,与设置的DTA和g值匹配的像素百分比是可比的。从统计学上说,在脑部病例(98.77±1.03 vs 97.62±1.66,P = 0.0218)和头颈部病例(97.39±2.13)中,EDR2胶片与I'matriXX之间没有观察到显着的像素通过g的平均百分比差异。 vs 97.17±1.52%,P = 0.7404)。结论:由于阵列检测器的简单性和快速的评估过程,它可以在繁忙的部门常规使用,而不会影响测量精度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号