慒riends in High Places?: Background on AAPS v. Hillary Clinton, the Health Care Task Force Lawsuit

摘要

Prompt Congressional action is required to ensure thatcriminal and ethical misdeeds associated with attempts tocovertly shape the National Health Care Policy do not becomewhitewashed as a “confusion in lexicon” when in fact there isample evidence to suggest obstruction of justice by those withfriends in high places.The facts are clear. Early in their administration, the Presidentand First Lady put forth a concept for a massive reordering of ourNational Health Care System. The bureaucratic details were to becrafted by a secret advisory task force, then rammed through aDemocratic controlled Congress in the Administration’s first 100days. This Blitzkrieg was to be headed by the Clintons’ friend ofthirty years (and the President’s Oxford roommate) Ira Magaziner.To insure secrecy and control over the process, Hillary Clinton wasnamed Chairperson and she in turn tasked her law partner (thenWhite House Counsel) Vince Foster to design the legal strategywith the assistance of another law partner, Webster Hubbell(the Associate Attorney General), and friend Beth Nolan, deputyWhite House counsel.