首页> 外文期刊>Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis. >Effects of Combination Therapy with Cilostazol and Probucol versus Monotherapy with Cilostazol on Coronary Plaque, Lipid and Biomarkers: SECURE Study, a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
【24h】

Effects of Combination Therapy with Cilostazol and Probucol versus Monotherapy with Cilostazol on Coronary Plaque, Lipid and Biomarkers: SECURE Study, a Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

机译:西洛他唑和普罗布考联合治疗与西洛他唑单药治疗对冠脉斑块,血脂和生物标志物的影响:SECURE研究,一项双盲,随机对照临床试验

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim : The study aim is to investigate synergistic effects of cilostazol and probucol combination therapy on coronary plaque volume and composition. Methods : A total of 119 patients undergoing coronary stenting were treated with probucol and cilostazol combination therapy (group Ⅰ) or with cilostazol monotherapy (group Ⅱ) in a double-blind, randomized multicenter trial, and evaluated by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS) at baseline and 9-month follow-up for changes in coronary plaque volume and composition at an index intermediate lesion with luminal narrowing ≥30% and <70% and for neointimal hyperplasia at the stented segment. In all patients simvastatin 20 mg was started with enrollment. Results : Qualifying VH-IVUS data from 91 patients were included in the final analysis. There were no significant differences between group Ⅰ and Ⅱ with respect to the primary endpoint, nominal change in normalized total atheroma volume (TAV) of the index intermediate coronary lesion (Δ?12.6±17.7 vs. ?14.2±20.2 mm3, p =0.691), or plaque composition. Plaque regression was observed in more than 70% of patients in both groups. Diabetes was the only significant independent determinant of changes in TAV ( β =0.22, p =0.037). There were greater decreases in total cholesterol (Δ?51.8±33.0 vs. ?25.4±39.1 mg/dL, p <0.001) and LDL (Δ?33.5±30.5 vs. ?20.3±30.8 mg/dL, p =0.044) levels in group Ⅰ than in group Ⅱ. However, HDL cholesterol (Δ?11.2±8.5 vs. 2.7±7.7 mg/dL, p <0.001) and apoA1 (Δ?18.2±21.4 vs. 10.0±16.5 mg/dL, p <0.001) levels were also significantly decreased in group Ⅰ compared with group Ⅱ. Conclusions : There were no significant differences in changes in plaque volume or composition between the cilostazol and probucol combination therapy and cilostazol monotherapy group despite different impacts of the treatments on lipid biomarkers.
机译:目的:研究西洛他唑和普罗布考联合治疗对冠状动脉斑块体积和组成的协同作用。方法:在双盲,随机,多中心试验中,对119例接受冠脉支架置入术的患者进行普罗布考和西洛他唑联合治疗(Ⅰ组)或西洛他唑单药治疗(Ⅱ组),并通过虚拟组织学血管内超声(VH-在基线期和9个月的随访中,观察到中度病变处管腔狭窄≥30%和<70%的冠状动脉斑块体积和组成的变化以及支架段的新内膜增生。在所有患者中,辛伐他汀20 mg开始入组。结果:最终分析中包括来自91例患者的合格VH-IVUS数据。 Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组在主要终点,中度冠状动脉病变的标准化总动脉粥样硬化体积(TAV)的名义变化方面没有显着差异(Δ?12.6±17.7vs.?14.2±20.2mm 3 ,p = 0.691)或斑块组成。两组中超过70%的患者观察到斑块消退。糖尿病是TAV变化的唯一重要独立决定因素(β= 0.22,p = 0.037)。总胆固醇(Δ?51.8±33.0vs.?25.4±39.1mg / dL,p <0.001)和LDL(Δ?33.5±30.5vs.?20.3±30.8mg / dL,p = 0.044)水平有更大的降低Ⅰ组比Ⅱ组好。然而,HDL胆固醇(Δ?11.2±8.5 vs. 2.7±7.7 mg / dL,p <0.001)和apoA1(Δ?18.2±21.4 vs. 10.0±16.5 mg / dL,p <0.001)水平也显着降低。 Ⅰ组与Ⅱ组比较。结论:西洛他唑和普罗布考联合治疗与西洛他唑单药治疗组的斑块体积或组成变化无显着差异,尽管这些治疗对脂质生物标志物的影响不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号