...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology >Bedside prediction of the central venous catheter insertion depth – Comparison of different techniques
【24h】

Bedside prediction of the central venous catheter insertion depth – Comparison of different techniques

机译:中心静脉导管插入深度的床旁预测–不同技术的比较

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background and Aims: Central venous catheterization is a frequently performed procedure in anesthesia and critical care, and is indispensable in the practice of emergency medicine. Correct positioning of the central venous catheter (CVC) tip is often regarded as a secondary goal and there are various complications that can occur due to abnormal position of the catheter tip. Different methods have been advocated to guide accurate prediction of optimal CVC depth insertion before or during the procedure at the bedside. Material and Methods: A prospective randomized double blinded study was conducted in 180 patients aged between 18 to 65 years requiring central venous catheterization. The optimal depth of insertion of right internal jugular vein (IJV) catheter using three different techniques, Peres' formula method, Landmark technique and Intra atrial Electrocardiography (ECG) guided technique was performed and the three techniques were compared with respect to optimal positioning using carina as a landmark in post procedural chest radiograph. Correct position of the catheter tip was considered upto 1 cm above or below the carina in post procedure X ray. Results: The average final depth of insertion was 15.30 ± 0.62 cms in the Formula group, 12.74 ± 0.77 cms in landmark group and 12.64 ± 0.70 cms in ECG group. The vertical distance from carina was 0.91 ± 0.94 cms in formula group, 0.54 ± 0.67 cms in landmark group and 0.53 ± 0.43 cms in ECG group. The CVC tip was properly positioned within 1 cm above and below the carina in 58.33% patients in the formula group, 93.33% patients in landmark group and 96.67% patients in ECG group. Conclusion: We conclude that both landmark guidance and ECG guidance are comparable with regard to accurate central venous catheter tip positioning when CVCs are placed through right internal jugular vein whereas formula based technique is least accurate and results in over insertion of CVCs.
机译:背景与目的:中心静脉导管插入术是麻醉和重症监护中经常执行的程序,在急诊医学的实践中必不可少。中心静脉导管(CVC)尖端的正确定位通常被认为是次要目标,由于导管尖端的异常位置,可能会发生各种并发症。在床旁手术之前或期间,已经提倡不同的方法来指导最佳CVC深度插入的准确预测。材料与方法:前瞻性随机双盲研究在180位年龄在18至65岁之间,需要中心静脉导管插入术的患者中进行。使用Peres公式法,Landmark技术和心房内心电图(ECG)引导技术三种不同的技术,对右颈内静脉(IJV)导管的最佳插入深度进行了比较,并比较了三种技术相对于使用鼻腔的最佳定位作为术后胸部X光片的标志性建筑。术后X射线检查认为导管尖端的正确位置在隆突上方或下方1 cm以内。结果:公式组的平均最终插入深度为15.30±0.62 cms,界标组为12.74±0.77 cms,ECG组为12.64±0.70 cms。公式组与隆起的垂直距离为0.91±0.94 cms,界标组为0.54±0.67 cms,ECG组为0.53±0.43 cms。公式组中58.33%的患者,界标组的93.33%的患者和心电图组的96.67%的患者的CVC尖端正确地位于隆突上下1 cm以内。结论:我们得出的结论是,当通过右颈内静脉放置CVC时,在精确的中心静脉导管尖端定位方面,界标引导和ECG引导是可比的,而基于公式的技术最不准确,并且会导致CVC过度插入。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号