...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology >Buprenorphine for postoperative analgesia: Axillary brachial plexus block versus intramuscular administration in a placebo-controlled trial
【24h】

Buprenorphine for postoperative analgesia: Axillary brachial plexus block versus intramuscular administration in a placebo-controlled trial

机译:丁丙诺啡用于术后镇痛:安慰剂对照试验中腋臂臂丛神经阻滞与肌肉注射

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Aims: Peripheral administration of opioids has been suggested for prolongation of regional analgesia. This prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study was undertaken to compare the effect of regional (axillary brachial plexus block [ABPB]) versus intramuscular (IM) buprenorphine (2 μg/kg) in adults. Material and Methods: Seventy-five adults undergoing upper limb surgery received ABPB with local anaesthetic (15 ml 0.5% bupivacaine, 15 ml 2% lignocaine with adrenaline 1:200,000, 9 ml normal saline [NS]). In addition, regional group RB (n = 25) received buprenorphine 2 μg/kg in ABPB and 1 ml NS IM. Systemic Group SB (n = 25) received 1 ml NS in ABPB and buprenorphine 2 μg/kg IM. Group C (n = 25) received 1 ml NS in ABPB and IM. Onset, duration of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic parameters, sedation score, pain scores using visual analog scale, duration of postoperative analgesia, rescue analgesic (RA) requirement, adverse events, and patient satisfaction were noted. Results: Demographics, onset and duration of sensory, motor block were similar. RB group had longest duration of analgesia (20.61 ± 1.33 h) compared to SB (10.91 ± 0.90 h) and control group (5.86 ± 0.57 h) (P P = 0.000 RB vs. SB/C and SB vs. C). SB group had a maximum number of side effects (P = 0.041, SB vs. RB/C). Patient satisfaction was highest with group RB (P P = 0.06 SB vs. C). Conclusion: Buprenorphine 2 μg/kg in axillary plexus block provides significantly prolonged analgesia with less RA requirement and greater patient satisfaction compared to IM administration. This is highly suggestive of action on peripheral opioid receptors.
机译:背景和目的:已建议将阿片类药物外周给药以延长局部镇痛作用。这项前瞻性,随机,双盲安慰剂对照研究旨在比较成人区域性(臂臂丛神经阻滞[ABPB])与肌内(IM)丁丙诺啡(2μg/ kg)的作用。材料和方法:75名接受上肢手术的成人接受局部麻醉的ABPB(15毫升0.5%布比卡因,15毫升2%利多卡因和肾上腺素1:200,000、9毫升生理盐水[NS])。此外,RB组(n = 25)在ABPB和1 ml NS IM中接受丁丙诺啡2μg/ kg。全身性SB组(n = 25)在ABPB中接受1 ml NS和丁丙诺啡2μg/ kg IM。 C组(n = 25)在ABPB和IM中接受了1 ml NS。记录发作,感觉和运动阻滞持续时间,血流动力学参数,镇静分数,使用视觉模拟量表的疼痛分数,术后镇痛持续时间,急救镇痛(RA)要求,不良事件和患者满意度。结果:人口统计学,感觉,运动障碍的发作和持续时间相似。与SB(10.91±0.90 h)和对照组(5.86±0.57 h)相比,RB组的镇痛时间最长(20.61±1.33 h)(P P = 0.000 RB vs. SB / C和SB vs. C)。 SB组的副作用最大(P = 0.041,SB vs. RB / C)。 RB组的患者满意度最高(P = 0.06 SB vs. C)。结论:与IM给药相比,腋丛神经阻滞中2μg/ kg的丁丙诺啡可显着延长镇痛时间,RA需求更少,患者满意度更高。这高度暗示了对外周阿片受体的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号