...
首页> 外文期刊>Jornal de Pediatria >Application of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 in pediatric patients with complex chronic conditions,
【24h】

Application of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 in pediatric patients with complex chronic conditions,

机译:儿童死亡率指数2在复杂慢性病患儿中的应用,

获取原文

摘要

Objective:To evaluate the performance of the Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 (PIM2) in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) with a high prevalence of patients with complex chronic conditions (CCCs), and compare the performance between patients with and without CCCs.Methods:A prospective cohort study was conducted in a PICU in Brazil, with patients admitted between 2009 and 2011. The performance was evaluated through discrimination and calibration. Discrimination was assessed by calculating the area under the ROC curve, and calibration was determined using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test.Results:A total of 677 patients were included in the study, of which 83.9% had a CCC. Overall mortality was 9.7%, with a trend of higher mortality among patients with CCCs when compared to patients without CCCs (10.3% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.27), but with no difference in the mean probability of death estimated by PIM2 (5.9% vs. 5.6%, p = 0.5). Discrimination was considered adequate in the general population (0.840) and in patients with and without CCCs (0.826 and 0.944). Calibration was considered inadequate in the general population and in patients with CCCs (p 0.0001 and p 0.0001), but it was considered adequate in patients without CCCs (p = 0.527).Conclusions:PIM2 showed poor performance in patients with CCCs and in the general population. This result may be secondary to differences in the characteristics between the study samples (high prevalence of patients with CCCs); the performance of the PIM2 should not be ruled out.
机译:目的:评估儿科重症监护病房(CCC)患病率较高的小儿重症监护病房(PICU)的儿童死亡率指数2(PIM2)的表现,并比较有无CCC的患者的表现。方法:在巴西的PICU进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象为2009年至2011年之间入院的患者。通过计算ROC曲线下的面积评估歧视,并使用Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验确定校准。结果:研究共纳入677例患者,其中83.9%的患者具有CCC。总死亡率为9.7%,与无CCC的患者相比,具有CCC的患者有更高的死亡率(10.3%对6.4%,p = 0.27),但PIM2估计的平均死亡概率无差异(5.9) %与5.6%,p = 0.5)。一般人群(0.840)以及有无CCC的患者(0.826和0.944)的歧视被认为是足够的。在一般人群和患有CCC的患者中,校正被认为是不充分的(p <0.0001和p <0.0001),但是在没有CCC的患者中则被认为是足够的(p = 0.527)。结论:PIM2在患有CCC的患者和在CCC中的患者表现较差。普通人群。该结果可能是由于研究样本之间的特征差异(CCC患者的高患病率)所致;不应排除PIM2的性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号