首页> 外文期刊>JMIR Research Protocols >Retrieval of Publications Addressing Shared Decision Making: An Evaluation of Full-Text Searches on Medical Journal Websites
【24h】

Retrieval of Publications Addressing Shared Decision Making: An Evaluation of Full-Text Searches on Medical Journal Websites

机译:检索解决共享决策问题的出版物:评估医学期刊网站上的全文检索

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Full-text searches of articles increase the recall, defined by the proportion of relevant publications that are retrieved. However, this method is rarely used in medical research due to resource constraints. For the purpose of a systematic review of publications addressing shared decision making, a full-text search method was required to retrieve publications where shared decision making does not appear in the title or abstract. Objective The objective of our study was to assess the efficiency and reliability of full-text searches in major medical journals for identifying shared decision making publications. Methods A full-text search was performed on the websites of 15 high-impact journals in general internal medicine to look up publications of any type from 1996-2011 containing the phrase “shared decision making”. The search method was compared with a PubMed search of titles and abstracts only. The full-text search was further validated by requesting all publications from the same time period from the individual journal publishers and searching through the collected dataset. Results The full-text search for “shared decision making” on journal websites identified 1286 publications in 15 journals compared to 119 through the PubMed search. The search within the publisher-provided publications of 6 journals identified 613 publications compared to 646 with the full-text search on the respective journal websites. The concordance rate was 94.3% between both full-text searches. Conclusions Full-text searching on medical journal websites is an efficient and reliable way to identify relevant articles in the field of shared decision making for review or other purposes. It may be more widely used in biomedical research in other fields in the future, with the collaboration of publishers and journals toward open-access data.
机译:背景技术文章的全文搜索可以提高召回率,这取决于检索到的相关出版物的比例。但是,由于资源限制,这种方法很少用于医学研究。为了系统地审查涉及共享决策的出版物,需要全文搜索方法来检索标题或摘要中未出现共享决策的出版物。目的我们的研究目的是评估主要医学期刊上全文检索的效率和可靠性,以识别共享的决策出版物。方法在15种高影响力的普通内科期刊的网站上进行全文搜索,以查找1996-2011年间任何类型的包含“共同决策”的出版物。该搜索方法仅与PubMed的标题和摘要搜索进行了比较。通过从各个期刊出版商处请求同一时间段内的所有出版物并搜索收集的数据集,进一步验证了全文搜索。结果在期刊网站上对“共同决策”进行的全文搜索确定了15种期刊中的1286种出版物,而PubMed搜索为119种。在由发行人提供的6种期刊的出版物中进行搜索可以找到613种出版物,而对646种出版物进行了相应的全文搜索。两次全文检索之间的一致性率为94.3%。结论在医学期刊网站上进行全文搜索是识别共享决策领域中相关文章以进行审核或其他目的的有效且可靠的方法。随着出版商和期刊在开放存取数据方面的合作,未来它可能会在其他领域的生物医学研究中得到更广泛的应用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号