首页> 外文期刊>JMIR Research Protocols >Clinical Utility of an Observation and Response Chart With Human Factors Design Characteristics and a Track and Trigger System: Study Protocol for a Two-Phase Multisite Multiple-Methods Design
【24h】

Clinical Utility of an Observation and Response Chart With Human Factors Design Characteristics and a Track and Trigger System: Study Protocol for a Two-Phase Multisite Multiple-Methods Design

机译:具有人为因素设计特征和跟踪与触发系统的观测和响应图的临床实用性:两阶段多站点多方法设计的研究方案

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Clinical deterioration of adult patients in acute medical-surgical wards continues to occur, despite a range of systems and processes designed to minimize this risk. In Australia, a standardized template for adult observation charts using human factors design principles and decision-support characteristics was developed to improve the detection of and response to abnormal vital signs. Objective To describe the study protocol for the clinical testing of these observation and response charts (ORCs). Methods We propose a two-phase multisite multiple-methods design to test the initial clinical utility of the charts in 10 hospitals of differing types and sizes across state jurisdictions in Australia. Data collection in the first phase includes user surveys, observations and field notes by project officers, handover de-briefs (short interviews with small groups of staff), and an audit of ORC documentation completion compared to the site’s existing observation chart. For the second phase, data will be collected using a retrospective audit of observation documentation from the previous hospital observation chart, prospective audit of observation documentation following implementation of the selected ORC, user focus groups, observational field notes, and patient outcome data from routinely collected organizational data sources. Results Site selection and preparation, project officer training, chart selection and implementation, participant recruitment, and data collection has been completed and the analysis of these results are in progress. Conclusions This detailed description of these study methods and data collection approaches will enable a comprehensive assessment of the clinical utility of these newly developed track and trigger charts and will be useful for clinicians and researchers when planning and implementing similar studies. Potential methodological limitations are also noted.
机译:背景技术尽管有一系列旨在将这种风险降到最低的系统和方法,但在急性医疗外科病房中,成年患者的临床恶化仍在继续发生。在澳大利亚,开发了使用人为因素设计原则和决策支持特征的成人观察图标准化模板,以改善对异常生命体征的检测和响应。目的描述对这些观察和反应图(ORC)进行临床测试的研究方案。方法我们建议采用两阶段多站点多方法设计,以测试澳大利亚各州管辖范围内10家不同类型和规模的医院图表的初始临床效用。第一阶段的数据收集包括用户调查,项目官员的观察和现场笔记,移交情况汇报(与少量工作人员进行的简短访谈)以及与站点现有观察图相比对ORC文档完成情况的审核。对于第二阶段,将使用以前医院观察图中的观察文献回顾性审核,实施选定的ORC,用户焦点小组,观察领域注释以及常规收集的患者结果数据后对观察文献进行前瞻性审核来收集数据组织数据源。结果已经完成了选址和准备,项目官员培训,图表选择和实施,参与者招募以及数据收集的工作,并且正在对这些结果进行分析。结论对这些研究方法和数据收集方法的详细说明将能够对这些新开发的跟踪图和触发图的临床效用进行全面评估,并且对于计划和实施类似研究的临床医生和研究人员将非常有用。还指出了潜在的方法学局限性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号