首页> 外文期刊>JMIR Mental Health >Process and Effects Evaluation of a Digital Mental Health Intervention Targeted at Improving Occupational Well-Being: Lessons From an Intervention Study With Failed Adoption
【24h】

Process and Effects Evaluation of a Digital Mental Health Intervention Targeted at Improving Occupational Well-Being: Lessons From an Intervention Study With Failed Adoption

机译:旨在改善职业幸福感的数字心理健康干预的过程和效果评估:采用失败的干预研究的经验教训

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Digital interventions have the potential to serve as cost-effective ways to manage occupational stress and well-being. However, little is known about the adoption of individual-level digital interventions at organizations. Objectives The aim of this paper is to study the effects of an unguided digital mental health intervention in occupational well-being and the factors that influence the adoption of the intervention. Methods The intervention was based on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and its aim was to teach skills for stress management and mental well-being. It was delivered via a mobile and a Web-based app that were offered to employees of two information and communication technology (ICT) companies. The primary outcome measures were perceived stress and work engagement, measured by a 1-item stress questionnaire (Stress) and the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-9). The intervention process was evaluated regarding the change mechanisms and intervention stages using mixed methods. The initial interviews were conducted face-to-face with human resource managers (n=2) of both companies in August 2013. The participants were recruited via information sessions and email invitations. The intervention period took place between November 2013 and March 2014. The participants were asked to complete online questionnaires at baseline, two months, and four months after the baseline measurement. The final phone interviews for the volunteer participants (n=17) and the human resource managers (n=2) were conducted in April to May 2014, five months after the baseline. Results Of all the employees, only 27 (8.1%, 27/332) took the app into use, with a mean use of 4.8 (SD 4.7) different days. In the beginning, well-being was on good level in both companies and no significant changes in well-being were observed. The activities of the intervention process failed to integrate the intervention into everyday activities at the workplace. Those who took the app into use experienced many benefits such as relief in stressful situations. The app was perceived as a toolkit for personal well-being that gives concrete instructions on how mindfulness can be practiced. However, many barriers to participate in the intervention were identified at the individual level, such as lack of time, lack of perceived need, and lack of perceived benefits. Conclusions The findings suggest that neither the setting nor the approach used in this study were successful in adopting new digital interventions at the target organizations. Barriers were faced at both the organizational as well as the individual level. At the organizational level, top management needs to be involved in the intervention planning for fitting into the organization policies, the existing technology infrastructure, and also targeting the organizational goals. At the individual level, concretizing the benefits of the preventive intervention and arranging time for app use at the workplace are likely to increase adoption.
机译:背景技术数字干预措施有可能成为经济有效的方式来管理职业压力和福祉。但是,对于组织采用个人级别的数字干预知之甚少。目的本文的目的是研究无指导的数字心理健康干预对职业幸福感的影响以及影响采取干预措施的因素。方法干预措施以接受和承诺治疗(ACT)为基础,旨在教授压力管理和心理健康的技能。它是通过移动和基于Web的应用程序交付的,该应用程序提供给两家信息和通信技术(ICT)公司的员工。主要的结局指标是感知的压力和工作投入,通过1个项目的压力调查表(Stress)和乌得勒支工作投入量表(UWES-9)进行测量。使用混合方法对干预过程的变化机制和干预阶段进行了评估。 2013年8月,与两家公司的人力资源经理(n = 2)进行了初次面谈。参与者通过信息发布会和电子邮件邀请被招募。干预期为2013年11月至2014年3月。要求参与者在基线测量后,基线测量后两个月和四个月完成在线问卷调查。志愿者参加者(n = 17)和人力资源经理(n = 2)的最后电话访谈是在基线之后五个月于2014年4月至2014年5月进行的。结果在所有员工中,只有27名(8.1%,27/332)使该应用程序投入使用,平均每天使用4.8(SD 4.7)。最初,两家公司的幸福感都很好,并且没有发现幸福感的显着变化。干预过程的活动未能将干预融入工作场所的日常活动中。那些使用该应用程序的人会遇到很多好处,例如在压力大的情况下得到缓解。该应用程序被视为个人福祉的工具包,其中提供了有关如何练习正念的具体说明。但是,在个人层面上发现了许多参与干预措施的障碍,例如缺乏时间,缺乏感知的需求以及缺乏感知的收益。结论结论表明,本研究中使用的设置和方法均未成功地在目标组织中采用新的数字干预措施。组织和个人都面临障碍。在组织级别,高层管理人员需要参与干预计划,以适应组织策略,现有技术基础架构以及组织目标。在个人层面上,将预防性干预的好处具体化并安排在工作场所使用应用程序的时间可能会增加采用率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号