...
首页> 外文期刊>Drug Design, Development and Therapy >Clinical efficacy of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis of recent clinical trials
【24h】

Clinical efficacy of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors in imatinib-resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a meta-analysis of recent clinical trials

机译:第二代酪氨酸激酶抑制剂在伊马替尼耐药胃肠道间质瘤中的临床疗效:近期临床试验的荟萃分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Primary and secondary resistance to imatinib, a selective receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is a serious clinical problem in the control of advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). Here we report on a meta-analysis we performed to evaluate the efficacy of second-generation TKIs in the treatment of patients with imatinib-resistant GIST.Methods: Randomized controlled trials evaluating the clinical efficacy of second-generation TKIs were identified by searching PubMed and EMBASE from 2000 to February 2014. Outcomes subjected to analysis were progression-free survival and overall survival. Statistical analyses were performed using Review Manager version 5.1.0 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK). Weighted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the outcomes. Fixed-effects or random-effects models were used, depending on the degree of heterogeneity across the selected studies.Results: Three randomized controlled trials were selected for meta-analysis. Among imatinib-resistant or imatinib-intolerant patients, 541 received second-generation TKIs (sunitinib, nilotinib, or regorafenib) and 267 controls received placebo or best supportive care. Progression-free survival was significantly improved in the TKI-treated group (HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.24–0.59; P<0.0001). No statistically significant difference was detected in overall survival between the treatment group and the control group (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.71–1.03; P=0.09). In the subgroup of patients who were resistant or intolerant to both imatinib and sunitinib, TKI therapy (nilotinib or regorafenib) improved progression-free survival (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.19–0.84; P=0.02) but not overall survival (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.63–1.08; P=0.17). Regorafenib was shown to be effective in terms of progression-free survival across different subpopulations of patients who were resistant to both imatinib and sunitinib.Conclusion: Second-generation TKIs (sunitinib, nilotinib, and regorafenib) are effective in improving progression-free survival but not overall survival in patients with GIST who are resistant or intolerant to imatinib or to imatinib and sunitinib. Regorafenib is promising as a third-line treatment option for patients with advanced GIST.
机译:背景:对伊马替尼(一种选择性受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI))的初级和次级耐药性是控制晚期胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)的严重临床问题。在这里,我们报告了一项荟萃分析,以评估第二代TKI在伊马替尼耐药GIST患者中的疗效。方法:通过搜索PubMed和EMBASE从2000年至2014年2月。接受分析的结果是无进展生存期和总体生存期。使用Review Manager版本5.1.0(Cochrane Collaboration,牛津,英国)进行统计分析。计算结果的加权危险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CIs)。根据所选择研究的异质性程度,使用固定效应或随机效应模型。结果:选择了三项随机对照试验进行荟萃分析。在伊马替尼耐药或伊马替尼不耐受的患者中,有541例接受了第二代TKI(舒尼替尼,尼洛替尼或瑞戈非尼),267例接受了安慰剂或最佳支持治疗。 TKI治疗组的无进展生存期得到了显着改善(HR 0.38; 95%CI 0.24-0.59; P <0.0001)。在治疗组和对照组之间,总生存期无统计学差异(HR 0.85; 95%CI 0.71–1.03; P = 0.09)。在对伊马替尼和舒尼替尼均耐药或不耐受的患者亚组中,TKI治疗(尼洛替尼或雷戈非尼)可改善无进展生存期(HR 0.40; 95%CI 0.19-0.84; P = 0.02),但不能改善总生存期(HR 0.83) ; 95%CI 0.63–1.08; P = 0.17)。雷戈非尼在对伊马替尼和舒尼替尼均耐药的不同亚群患者的无进展生存方面表现出有效的结论。第二代TKIs(舒尼替尼,尼洛替尼和雷戈非尼)可有效改善无进展生存,但对伊马替尼或伊马替尼和舒尼替尼耐药或不耐受的GIST患者的总生存期。瑞戈非尼有望成为晚期GIST患者的三线治疗选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号