首页> 外文期刊>The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine >Magnetic resonance urethrography versus conventional retrograde urethrography in the evaluation of urethral stricture: Comparison with surgical findings
【24h】

Magnetic resonance urethrography versus conventional retrograde urethrography in the evaluation of urethral stricture: Comparison with surgical findings

机译:磁共振尿道造影与常规逆行尿道造影在尿道狭窄评估中的作用:与手术结果的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Back ground Urethral stricture means fibrous scarring of the urethra caused by collagen and fibroblast proliferation. Magnetic resonance urethrography was emerging as a new modality for imaging the male urethra. Objectives To evaluate the accuracy of MR urethrography in comparison to the conventional retrograde urethrography (RUG) in the evaluation of urethral stricture in comparison with surgical findings. Design, setting and participants: This prospective study was done in the period from January 2010 to March 2012 including 20 male patients with initial diagnosis of anterior urethral stricture (diagnosed by RUG). Both newly diagnosed and recurrent cases were included regardless of the etiology of stricture. The mean age was 49.6 ± 16.4 years (ranged from 19 to 70). All patients were evaluated by conventional retrograde urethrography (RUG) and magnetic resonance urethrography (MR urethrography). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Magnetic resonance urethrography images were analyzed, focusing on the signal intensity, location and length of the stricture. Additionally, MR findings were evaluated regarding the urethra proximal to the stricture, the corpora spongiosa surrounding the stricture, adjacent organ injuries, and the associated complications. Data obtained were compared with operative findings in all patients. Results and limitations The mean stricture length as measured by MR urethrography and RGU was 1.32 ± 0.85 and 1.75 ± 1.02 respectively with a significant difference ( p 0.001). The mean intra-operative stricture length was 1.29 ± 0.83. MR urethrography was accurate in 19 patients (95%) while RUG was accurate in 15 patients (75%). This study has some limitations, firstly, a small number of patients are involved in this study, secondly, a 1 T magnet is used and finally, interobserver agreement was not obtained. Conclusion MR urethrography has a higher diagnostic accuracy in the detection of urethral stricture length than conventional RUG, that is crucial for proper selection of treatment modality.
机译:背景尿道狭窄是由胶原蛋白和成纤维细胞增殖引起的尿道纤维瘢痕形成。磁共振尿道造影术正在成为一种对男性尿道成像的新形式。目的评价MR尿道造影与常规逆行尿道造影(RUG)相比,评估尿道狭窄与手术结果的准确性。设计,背景和参与者:这项前瞻性研究于2010年1月至2012年3月进行,包括20例初步诊断为前尿道狭窄(由RUG诊断)的男性患者。无论狭窄的病因如何,均包括新诊断和复发的病例。平均年龄为49.6±16.4岁(范围从19到70)。所有患者均通过常规逆行尿道造影(RUG)和磁共振尿道造影(MR尿道造影)进行评估。结果测量和统计分析分析了磁共振尿道造影图像,重点是狭窄部位的信号强度,位置和长度。此外,还对MR狭窄部位附近的尿道,狭窄部位周围的海绵体,邻近器官损伤以及相关并发症进行了MR检查。将获得的数据与所有患者的手术结果进行比较。结果与局限性MR尿道造影和RGU测量的平均狭窄长度分别为1.32±0.85和1.75±1.02,差异有统计学意义(p <0.001)。术中平均狭窄长度为1.29±0.83。 MR尿道造影在19例患者中准确(95%),而RUG准确在15例患者中(75%)。该研究存在一些局限性,首先,该研究涉及的患者数量很少;其次,使用了1 T磁体,最后,未获得观察者之间的同意。结论MR尿道造影在检测尿道狭窄长度方面比常规的RUG具有更高的诊断准确性,这对于正确选择治疗方式至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号