首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of Urology >Magnetic resonance urethrography to assess obliterative posterior urethral stricture: comparison to conventional retrograde urethrography with voiding cystourethrography.
【24h】

Magnetic resonance urethrography to assess obliterative posterior urethral stricture: comparison to conventional retrograde urethrography with voiding cystourethrography.

机译:磁共振尿道造影可评估闭塞性后尿道狭窄:与常规膀胱尿道造影的逆行尿道造影比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

PURPOSE: We prospectively evaluated magnetic resonance urethrography for depicting obliterative posterior urethral stricture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 25 men with a mean age of 48.7 years (range 21 to 72) with complete posterior urethral stricture were studied preoperatively with axial and sagittal turbo spin-echo T2, sagittal T1 and contrast enhanced sagittal T1-weighted images. Of the 25 patients 22 underwent conventional retrograde urethrography with voiding cystourethrography. For magnetic resonance urethrography aseptic lubricant was infused through the external urethral meatus to dilate the distal urethra up to the stricture. Each imaging result was compared with a surgical specimen or a description of the surgical findings. Measurement errors were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The relationship between true and measured stricture length was evaluated by linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Based on magnetic resonance urethrography findings 2 patients with a less than 1 cm stricture were treated with internal urethrotomy, 21 with a more than 1 cm stricture underwent open urethroplasty and 2 with prostatic displacement and a 4 cm stricture needed the combined perineal and transpubic approach. The mean +/- SD measurement error on magnetic resonance urethrography imaging was significantly lower than that on conventional retrograde urethrography combined with voiding cystourethrography (0.4 +/- 0.4 vs 1.4 +/- 1.1 cm, p <0.001). Linear regression analysis showed a stronger linear relationship between magnetic resonance urethrography and surgical measurement (r(2) = 0.62, p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance urethrography is more effective for evaluating obliterative posterior urethral stricture than retrograde urethrography combined with voiding cystourethrography.
机译:目的:我们前瞻性评估磁共振尿道造影以描述闭塞性后尿道狭窄。材料与方法:共有25名平均年龄为48.7岁(21至72岁),完全后尿道狭窄的男性在术前接受了轴向和矢状涡轮旋转回声T2,矢状T1和对比增强型矢状T1加权图像的研究。在25例患者中,有22例接受了常规逆行尿道造影和膀胱尿道造影。对于磁共振尿道造影,通过外尿道口注入无菌润滑剂以扩张远端尿道直至狭窄。将每个成像结果与手术标本或手术结果描述进行比较。使用Wilcoxon符号秩检验分析测量误差。通过线性回归分析评估真实狭窄长度与测量狭窄长度之间的关系。结果:基于磁共振尿道造影的发现,2例狭窄小于1 cm的患者接受了内尿道切开术,21例狭窄大于1 cm的患者接受了开放性尿道成形术,2例前列腺移位和4 cm的狭窄需要将会阴和经耻骨联合方法。磁共振尿道造影的平均+/- SD测量误差显着低于常规逆行尿道造影和排尿膀胱尿道造影(0.4 +/- 0.4 vs 1.4 +/- 1.1 cm,p <0.001)。线性回归分析显示磁共振尿道造影与手术测量之间的线性关系更强(r(2)= 0.62,p <0.01)。结论:磁共振尿道造影比逆行尿道造影结合排尿膀胱尿道造影更有效地评估闭塞性后尿道狭窄。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号