...
首页> 外文期刊>Diagnostic pathology >Carcinoma involving the gallbladder: a retrospective review of 23 cases - pitfalls in diagnosis of gallbladder carcinoma
【24h】

Carcinoma involving the gallbladder: a retrospective review of 23 cases - pitfalls in diagnosis of gallbladder carcinoma

机译:胆囊癌23例回顾性研究-胆囊癌诊断的误区

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Carcinoma of the gallbladder (GBC) clinically mimics benign gallbladder diseases and often escapes detection until advanced stage. Despite the frequency of cholecystectomy, diagnosis of GBC remains problematic in many situations. We sought to identify pathologic features that contribute to the difficulty in recognition of GBC. Methods We identified 23 patients (ranged from 45 to 86 years, male to female ratio 1:4.5) with carcinoma involving the gallbladder referred to an academic medical center over a period of 10 years for study. This includes 10 cases of primary GBC, 6 cases of metastatic tumor to gallbladder, 6 cases of directly invasive adenocarcinoma arising elsewhere in the biliary tree, and one case of unidentified origin adenocarcinoma. Primary tumors include adenocarcinoma not otherwise specified (NOS) in 6 cases, papillary adenocarcinoma in 2 cases, and single cases of undifferentiated carcinoma and combined adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). Metastatic tumors to gallbladder were from a wide range of primary sites, predominantly the gastrointestinal tract. Results These cases illustrate seven potential pitfalls which can be encountered. These include: 1) mistakenly making a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of gallbladder when only benign lesions such as deeply penetrating Rokitansky-Aschoff sinuses are present (overdiagnosis), 2) misdiagnosing well-differentiated invasive carcinoma with minimal disease as benign disease (underdiagnosis), 3) differentiating between primary NEC of gallbladder and metastasis, 4) confusing primary mucinous adenocarcinoma of gallbladder with pseudomyxoma peritonei from a low grade appendiceal neoplasm disseminated to gallbladder, 5) confusing gangrenous necrosis related to cholecystitis with geographic tumoral necrosis, 6) undersampling early, grossly occult disease, and 7) misinterpreting extracellular mucin pools. Conclusions Clinical history and a high index of suspicion are prerequisite to detecting GBC. Detection of GBC at an early stage is difficult because the symptoms mimic benign gallbladder diseases. Misinterpretation of subtle microscopic abnormalities contributes diagnostic failures in early cases. Careful attention to any evidence of mural thickening, thorough sampling, particularly in older patients, and close examination of any deeply situated glandular structures are critical. Correlations with radiographic and clinical findings are important helps to avoid misdiagnosis in this commonly resected organ. Virtual Slides The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1443233938651038 webcite.
机译:背景技术胆囊癌(GBC)在临床上可模仿良性胆囊疾病,并且常常逃脱检测直至晚期。尽管进行了胆囊切除术,但GBC的诊断在许多情况下仍然存在问题。我们试图确定导致识别GBC困难的病理特征。方法我们确定了23例胆囊癌患者(年龄在45至86岁之间,男女比例为1:4.5),并在10年内转诊至学术医学中心进行研究。这包括10例原发性GBC,6例转移至胆囊的肿瘤,6例在胆管其他部位出现的直接浸润性腺癌,以及1例来源不明的腺癌。原发性肿瘤包括6例未另作说明的腺癌(NOS),2例乳头状腺癌和单例未分化癌以及合并的腺癌和神经内分泌癌(NEC)。转移到胆囊的肿瘤来自广泛的原发部位,主要是胃肠道。结果这些案例说明了可能遇到的七个潜在陷阱。其中包括:1)仅在良性病变(例如深穿透的Rokitansky-Aschoff鼻窦等良性病变)存在时错误诊断胆囊腺癌(过度诊断),2)将低分化的高分化浸润癌误诊为良性疾病(诊断不足),3 )区分原发性胆囊癌和转移灶,4)将原发性胆囊黏液性腺癌与假性粘液性腹膜瘤与扩散到胆囊的低度阑尾赘生物相混淆,5)混淆与胆囊炎相关的坏疽性坏死伴地理性肿瘤坏死,6)早期取样7)误解了细胞外粘蛋白池。结论临床病史和高度怀疑是检测GBC的前提。由于症状模仿良性胆囊疾病,因此很难在早期检测到GBC。对微小的微观异常的错误解释会导致早期病例的诊断失败。仔细注意壁增厚的证据,彻底取样(尤其是在老年患者中)以及仔细检查任何位于深处的腺体结构至关重要。与影像学检查和临床检查结果的相关性很重要,有助于避免在这个通常切除的器官中误诊。虚拟幻灯片可在此处找到本文的虚拟幻灯片:http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1443233938651038网站。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号