首页> 外文期刊>The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine >Epidural versus intravenous clonidine for postoperative patient controlled analgesia
【24h】

Epidural versus intravenous clonidine for postoperative patient controlled analgesia

机译:硬膜外与静脉注射可乐定用于术后患者自控镇痛

获取原文
           

摘要

unlike most other sedative drugs, 2 adrenoceptor agonists e.g (clonidine) are capable of producing both sedation and analgesia with little if any, respiratory change. The aim of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy, the respiratory and the endocrine effects of epidural versus intravenous clonidine for postoperative pain. Forty adult patients ASA I and II of both sexes were scheduled for elective lower abdominal or lower extremity surgical procedures. For postoperative pain relief , the patients were randomly divided into two groups, twenty patient of each. In (Group I) patients received intravenous clonidine through patient-controlled analgesia pump (IPCA). In (Group II) patients received epidural clonidine through patient-controlled analgesia pump (EPCA). A standard anaesthetic technique was employed to all patients and anaesthesia was maintained with gas oxygen halothane and muscle relaxant. Serial arterial and venous blood samples were taken to measure blood gases and endorphin level. After surgery patients with visual analogue scale ( VAS ) >4 were given clonidine initial dose 4μg/kg intravenous or epidural infusion over a period of 30 minutes then they were allowed to self administer clonidine using PCA pump which delivered a bolus dose of 0.5μg/kg with a 15 minute lockout interval to the corresponding route. Self-administered doses were (124.2±34.637μg) in intravenous group and (100.6±31.406μg) in epidural group. The total clonidine dose was (424. ±38.138μg) in intravenous group versus (399.8±47.371μg) in epidural group. Pain scores were lower after than before clonidine administration in both groups . No significant difference in pain scores were found between the two groups. There was also no significant changes in respiratory rate, arterial PH, Pa Co2 or Pa o2 in each studied group and no significant difference between the two groups. Forced vital capacity ( FVC ) and Forced expiratory volume in one second ( FEV1 ) were significantly reduced before clonidine injection in both groups. The beta endorphin level was increased after one hour of clonidine administration and there was no significant difference between the two groups. In conclusion Clonidine proves to be adequate alternative to opiates without their side effects and the dose of clonidine is lower by the epidural route
机译:与大多数其他镇静药不同,2种肾上腺素能受体激动剂(例如可乐定)能够产生镇静作用和镇痛作用,几乎没有呼吸变化。这项研究的目的是评估硬膜外与静脉注射可乐定对术后疼痛的镇痛效果,呼吸作用和内分泌作用。计划对40名男女成年的ASA I和ASA II患者进行择期下腹部或下肢外科手术。为了减轻术后疼痛,将患者随机分为两组,每组二十名。在(第一组)患者中,通过患者自控镇痛泵(IPCA)接受静脉注射可乐定。在(第二组)患者中,通过患者控制的镇痛泵(EPCA)接受硬膜外可乐定。所有患者均采用标准麻醉技术,并在气体氧氟烷和肌肉松弛剂下维持麻醉。采集连续的动脉和静脉血样以测量血气和内啡肽水平。手术后,视觉模拟评分(VAS)> 4的患者在30分钟内给予可乐定初始剂量4μg/ kg静脉内或硬膜外输注,然后允许他们使用PCA泵自行给药可乐定,剂量为0.5μg/ kg公斤,并在15分钟内锁定相应路线。静脉给药组自给药剂量为(124.2±34.637μg),硬膜外给药组为(100.6±31.406μg)。静脉注射组的总可乐定剂量为(424.±38.138μg),而硬膜外注射组的总可乐定剂量为(399.8±47.371μg)。两组患者服用可乐定后的疼痛评分均低于服用可乐定之前。两组之间的疼痛评分没有显着差异。每个研究组的呼吸频率,动脉PH,Pa Co2或Pa o2也没有显着变化,并且两组之间也没有显着差异。两组在注射可乐定之前,强制肺活量(FVC)和一秒钟的强制呼气量(FEV1)均显着降低。服用可乐定一小时后,β内啡肽水平增加,两组之间无显着差异。总之,可乐定被证明是鸦片制剂的适当替代品,且无副作用,并且通过硬膜外途径可乐定的剂量更低

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号