首页> 外文期刊>Developing Country Studies >Exploring the Kindergarten Teachers’ Assessment Practices in Ghana
【24h】

Exploring the Kindergarten Teachers’ Assessment Practices in Ghana

机译:探索加纳的幼儿园教师评估实践

获取原文
           

摘要

The study aimed at investigating kindergarten teachers’ assessment practices based on two subscales: (a) teachers’ modes of assessment frequently used, and (b) their reasons for selecting a particular mode of assessment. The sequential mixed methods research design was employed. The quantitative data were gathered through questionnaires administered to 192 teachers in public and private kindergartens in six regions of Ghana. The qualitative data were gathered through interviews with three participants selected from the 192 sampled teachers. Independent samples t-test was employed to test the quantitative data. The results of the study indicated that paper- and- pencil test mode of assessment is used frequently by the teachers. In addition teachers also appeared to be using a particular mode of assessment just to meet the expectations of the parents and educational leaders without meeting the curriculum assessment prescription. Results further showed no significant difference between the public and private kindergarten teachers on almost all the items in the two subscales used in this study but differed significantly on four reasons for selecting a particular mode of assessment. Teachers’ assessment practices are therefore not supported by any known developmentally assessment theory for children. Workshops and in-service education and training are therefore recommended for all the stakeholders including the parents, educational leaders and teachers on the use of developmentally appropriate assessment practices in a much more interactive manner.
机译:该研究旨在基于两个子量表来调查幼儿园教师的评估方式:(a)教师常用的评估方式,以及(b)选择特定评估方式的原因。采用了顺序混合方法研究设计。通过对加纳六个地区的公立和私立幼儿园的192名教师进行问卷调查,收集了定量数据。定性数据是通过采访从192名抽样教师中选出的三名参与者而收集的。采用独立样本t检验测试定量数据。研究结果表明,教师经常使用纸笔考试评估方式。另外,教师似乎也正在使用一种特殊的评估方式,只是为了满足父母和教育领导者的期望,而没有达到课程评估的规定。结果进一步表明,公立和私立幼儿园教师在本研究使用的两个子量表中的几乎所有项目上都没有显着差异,但在选择特定评估方式的四个原因上却存在显着差异。因此,任何已知的儿童发展评估理论均不支持教师的评估实践。因此,建议所有利益相关者(包括父母,教育领导者和教师)进行讲习班和在职教育与培训,以更具互动性的方式使用适合发展的评估实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号