首页> 外文期刊>Dental Journal: Majalah Kedokteran Gigi >Differences in tensile adhesion strength between HEMA and nonHEMA-based dentin bonding applied on superficial and deep dentin surfaces
【24h】

Differences in tensile adhesion strength between HEMA and nonHEMA-based dentin bonding applied on superficial and deep dentin surfaces

机译:HEMA和非HEMA牙本质粘接剂在表面和深层牙本质表面施加的拉伸粘合强度差异

获取原文
       

摘要

Background: Improvement in dentistry shows some progresses, due to patients awareness on the importance of dental care. Cervical lesion is the most common phenomenon which oftenly found 46.36% in man and 38.13% in woman. Cervical lesions need composite restoration for treatment to stop the process of tissue damage. The process of adhesion of composite restoration material to the structure of the tooth is not easily separated and it needs optimal function in the oral cavity. Application of dentin bonding agents to attach the composite is needed. Selection of HEMA-based bonding material and Hema free-based bonding material which have a different solvent in their composition, as applied to the dentin superficial and deep dentin, affect the results of debonding test. Debonding test is done to measure the adhesion strength of a bonding material. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze differences in tensile bond strength of dentine bonding HEMA-based and HEMA-free based after application in superficial and deep dentine surfaces. Method: The tooth of the bovine was as samples. A superficial dentine sample was taken from 0.5-1 mm of dentino enamel junction and a deep dentine sample was taken from 0.5 mm culmination of pulp horn. Dentine surface area was equal to p x r2 = (3.14 x 22) = 12.56 mm2. Six samples of HEMA-based bonding was applied to the dentine superficial. Six samples of HEMAfree based bonding was applied to the superficial dentine. Six samples of HEMA-based bonding was applied to the deep dentine. Six samples of HEMA-free based bonding was applied to the deep dentine. Tensile strength was measured using an Autograph AG-10TE. Result: There were differences tensile bond strength of dentine bonding HEMA-based and HEMA-free based after the application on superficial (p=0.000) and deep dentine surfaces (p=0.000). Conclusion: There were differences tensile bond strength of dentine bonding HEMA-based and HEMA-free based after the application on superficial and deep dentine surfaces. The use of dentine bonding materials HEMA-free based were better than HEMA-based after application on different dentine depths.
机译:背景:由于患者对牙科保健的重要性的认识,牙科的进步显示出一些进展。宫颈病变是最常见的现象,通常在男性中占46.36%,在女性中占38.13%。宫颈病变需要进行复合修复,以停止组织损伤的过程。复合修复材料与牙齿结构的粘附过程不容易分开,需要在口腔中发挥最佳功能。需要使用牙本质粘合剂来附着复合材料。组成不同的溶剂的HEMA基粘结材料和Hema游离基粘结材料的选择,如应用于牙本质表层和深层牙本质,会影响脱粘测试的结果。进行脱粘测试以测量粘合材料的粘合强度。目的:本研究的目的是分析应用在浅层和深层的牙本质表面后,基于HEMA和无HEMA的牙本质粘合的拉伸粘合强度的差异。方法:以牛的牙齿为样本。从牙本质牙釉质连接处的0.5-1 mm处获取表面的牙本质样本,从牙髓角的0.5 mm顶点获取深度的牙质样本。牙本质表面积等于p x r2 =(3.14 x 22)= 12.56 mm2。将六个基于HEMA的粘结样品施加到牙本质表层。将六个基于HEMAfree的粘合样品施加到浅层牙本质上。将六个基于HEMA的粘合样品应用于深层牙本质。将六个无HEMA粘结的样品应用于深层牙本质。使用Autograph AG-10TE测量拉伸强度。结果:在表层(p = 0.000)和深层的牙本质表面(p = 0.000)上应用后,基于HEMA的牙本质粘合和基于无HEMA的牙本质粘合的拉伸粘合强度存在差异。结论:在浅表和深齿表面应用后,基于HEMA和无HEMA的牙本质粘接的拉伸粘接强度存在差异。在不同的牙本质深度应用后,无HEMA的牙本质粘合材料的使用要优于基于HEMA的牙本质粘合材料。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号