首页> 外文期刊>Danishgah-i Ulum-i Pizishki va Khadamat-i Bihdashti-Darmani Shahid Sadugi Yazd. Majallah >In Vitro Comparison of the Accuracy of Primax, Insight Dental X-Ray Films and CMOS-APS Digital Imaging in Detection of Interproximal Caries.
【24h】

In Vitro Comparison of the Accuracy of Primax, Insight Dental X-Ray Films and CMOS-APS Digital Imaging in Detection of Interproximal Caries.

机译:Primax,Insight牙科X射线胶片和CMOS-APS数字成像在近端龋齿检测中的准确性的体外比较。

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction: Radiography is one of the most important diagnostic methods for evaluation of dental caries. On the other hand, the least amount of radiation along with high quality is a main gold standard. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of Primax, Insight Radiographic films, and direct digital images (Schick CMOS-APS), in detection of interproximal natural Caries.Methods: In this experimental invitro study, 208 extracted permanent molars and premolars were selected for study on the basis of varying caries depth. Exposure factors considered for conventional films and digital images were 70 Kvp and 8 mA, and exposure times for each of the three modalities were in the following order 0.20 s for Primax, 0.16 s for Insight and 0.08 s for digital images. All film types were subsequently automatically processed. The conventional radiographs and digital images were examined by five observers. They were asked to detect caries in the approximal surfaces. They had to indicate their certainty of decision separately for each interproximal side of each tooth on a 5-point confidence scale. Following acquisition of the image modalities, the teeth were sectioned mesiodistally along the long axis of the crowns. Sectioned teeth were evaluated for the absence or presence of approximal carious lesions as Gold Standard. Inter-observer agreement in detecting approximal caries, for each image using Kappa Value, was evaluated. Then sensitivity value, specificity value and the areas (Az) beneath Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were calculated.Results: A slight (k=0.01) inter-observer agreement was observed in comparison of Gold Standard. The sensitivity value of Primax was higher as compared to both Insight and digital images. Although the Az value indicated an overall better performance of Primax(0.64) as compared to both Insight(0.63) and digital images(0.61), all three modalities showed a trend of increasing sensitivity for deeper lesions. Results indicated no significant difference between the diagnostic accuracies of three imaging modalities in the detection of approximal carious lesions (p= 0.18). However, analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of three imaging modalities in the detection of degree of carious lesion was significant. (p=0.02).which indicated the superior performance of dental films as compared to digital images.Conclusion: All three performed modalities are poorl in the detection of enamel lesions. Considering limitations of this study, it is proposed that insight film and digital images should be endorsed for clinical use, especially since radiation exposure is reduced.
机译:简介:放射线照相术是评估龋齿的最重要的诊断方法之一。另一方面,最少量的辐射以及高质量是主要的金标准。这项研究的目的是比较Primax,Insight放射胶片和直接数字图像(Schick CMOS-APS)在检测近端自然龋齿中的诊断准确性。方法:在这项实验性体外研究中,提取了208颗恒磨牙和前磨牙根据不同的龋齿深度选择进行研究。对于常规胶片和数字图像,考虑的曝光系数为70 Kvp和8 mA,这三种模式的曝光时间分别为:Primax为0.20 s,Insight为0.16 s,数字图像为0.08 s。随后将自动处理所有胶片类型。五名观察员检查了传统的射线照片和数字图像。他们被要求检测大约表面的龋齿。他们必须在5点置信度标度上分别为每个牙齿的每个齿间侧面表明决定的确定性。在获取图像模态之后,沿冠的长轴近中距切开牙齿。按照金标准评估切片的牙齿是否存在大约龋齿病变。对于使用Kappa值的每个图像,评估了观察者之间在检测龋齿方面的一致性。然后计算灵敏度值,特异性值和受体工作特征曲线下的面积(Az)。结果:与金标准相比,观察者之间存在很小的观察者一致性(k = 0.01)。与Insight和数字图像相比,Primax的灵敏度值更高。尽管Az值表示与Insight(0.63)和数字图像(0.61)相比,Primax(0.64)的总体性能更好,但所有这三种方式均显示出对更深病变的敏感性增加的趋势。结果表明,三种成像方式的诊断准确性在检出近似龋齿病变方面无显着差异(p = 0.18)。然而,分析三种影像学方法在龋损程度检测中的诊断准确性是很重要的。 (p = 0.02)。这表明与数字图像相比,牙膜性能优越。结论:所有三种执行方式在牙釉质病变检测中均较差。考虑到这项研究的局限性,建议将有洞察力的胶片和数字图像用于临床,特别是因为减少了辐射暴露。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号