首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Digital Imaging >Comparison between Different Cost Devices for Digital Capture of X-ray Films: An Image Characteristics Detection Approach
【2h】

Comparison between Different Cost Devices for Digital Capture of X-ray Films: An Image Characteristics Detection Approach

机译:X射线胶片数字捕获的不同成本设备之间的比较:一种图像特征检测方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A common teleradiology practice is digitizing films. The costs of specialized digitizers are very high, that is why there is a trend to use conventional scanners and digital cameras. Statistical clinical studies are required to determine the accuracy of these devices, which are very difficult to carry out. The purpose of this study was to compare three capture devices in terms of their capacity to detect several image characteristics. Spatial resolution, contrast, gray levels, and geometric deformation were compared for a specialized digitizer ICR (US$ 15,000), a conventional scanner UMAX (US$ 1,800), and a digital camera LUMIX (US$ 450, but require an additional support system and a light box for about US$ 400). Test patterns printed in films were used. The results detected gray levels lower than real values for all three devices; acceptable contrast and low geometric deformation with three devices. All three devices are appropriate solutions, but a digital camera requires more operator training and more settings.
机译:普通的放射线学实践是将胶片数字化。专用数字转换器的成本非常高,这就是为什么存在使用传统扫描仪和数码相机的趋势的原因。需要统计临床研究来确定这些设备的准确性,这很难执行。这项研究的目的是比较三种捕获设备检测几种图像特征的能力。比较了专用数字化仪ICR(15,000美元),传统扫描仪UMAX(1,800美元)和数码相机LUMIX(450美元)的空间分辨率,对比度,灰度和几何变形,但需要额外的支持系统和一个约400美元的灯箱)。使用印在胶片上的测试图案。结果检测到的灰度级均低于所有三个设备的真实值。三种装置可提供可接受的对比度和低几何变形。这三种设备都是合适的解决方案,但是数码相机需要更多的操作员培训和更多的设置。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号