首页> 外文期刊>HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies >Toward the recovery of common sense in a post-critical intellectual ethos
【24h】

Toward the recovery of common sense in a post-critical intellectual ethos

机译:致力于在批判后的思想风气中恢复常识

获取原文
       

摘要

This article attempts to articulate what philosopherscientist Michael Polanyi meant by a post-critical intellectual ethos and to explore its implications for concrete academic practice. The modern critical tradition's strategy for defeating the demon of self-doubt and for securing certainty, as Hannah Arendt has written, restricts serious candidates for belief to those whose conditions of truth can be rendered wholly immanent to focal consciousness within a point of view that is simply taken for granted. Thereby it forecloses the possibility of recognizing the partiality of its own perspective vis-á-vis that of others, taking into account the relevant perspectives of other persons, and reaching any kind of sense in common between perspectives. The institutionalization of this strategy in 20th century academic life is amply and insightfully documented in Bruce Wilshire's Moral Collapse of the University. Michael Polanyi, in his writings, adumbrates a post-critical intellectual ethos in which the making of sense in common between persons of differing perspective is central to the enterprise of teaching, learning, and research.
机译:本文试图阐明哲学家迈克尔·波兰尼(Michael Polanyi)所指的后批判性思想风气,并探讨其对具体学术实践的影响。正如汉娜·阿伦特(Hannah Arendt)所写,现代批判传统的战胜自我怀疑的恶魔和确保确定性的策略,将严肃的信仰候选人限制在那些可以将真理的条件完全集中于焦点意识的人,即只是理所当然。因此,它排除了承认自己的观点相对于他人的观点的偏见的可能性,同时考虑了其他人的相关观点,并在观点之间达到了某种共同的意义。布鲁斯·威尔希尔(Bruce Wilshire)的《大学道德崩溃》充分记录了该策略在20世纪学术生活中的制度化。迈克尔·波拉尼(Michael Polanyi)在其著作中强调了后批判性的思想风气,在这种精神风气中,具有不同观点的人之间的共同理解是教学,学习和研究事业的核心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号