首页> 外文期刊>HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies >Pornography: Human right or human rights violation?
【24h】

Pornography: Human right or human rights violation?

机译:色情:人权还是侵犯人权?

获取原文
       

摘要

The article investigates the availability of pornographic media to under-aged users, specifically the already marginalised under-aged sector of the South African population. It argues that the availability of pornography is just another illustration of the systemic discrimination against this section of the population. Theoretical, non-experimental and clinical evidence illustrating the negative impact that the exposure to pornography has on children is presented against the background of the social reality of South Africa. The article finds that exposure to pornography leaves children even more vulnerable than they already are. The investigation of relevant legislation indicates that those who broadcast and/or sell pornography contravene South African law. The article concludes that the effects of pornography on children are far-reaching and potentially harmful. Children should be more effectively protected against exposure to pornography. Lastly, the role of faith-based organisations (FBOs) and the possibilities of their effective involvement, is explored.
机译:本文调查了未成年人使用色情媒体的情况,特别是南非人口中已经边缘化的未成年人群体。它认为,色情制品的提供只是对这一部分人口的系统性歧视的另一个例证。在南非的社会现实背景下,提出了理论,非实验和临床证据,这些证据说明了色情内容对儿童的负面影响。这篇文章发现,接触色情制品会使儿童比现在更加脆弱。有关立法的调查表明,广播和/或出售色情制品的人违反了南非法律。文章得出结论,色情对儿童的影响是深远的,并且可能有害。应该更有效地保护儿童免受色情内容的侵害。最后,探讨了基于信仰的组织(FBO)的作用及其有效参与的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号