Studying catchment storm response using event- and pre-event-water volumes as fractions of precipitation rather than discharge

摘要

Catchment response to precipitation is often investigated using two-component isotope-based hydrograph separation, which quantifies the contribution of precipitation (i.e., event water Qsube/sub ) or water from storage (i.e., pre-event water Qsubpe/sub ) to total discharge ( Q ) during storm events. In order to better understand streamflow-generating mechanisms, two-component hydrograph separation studies often seek to relate the event-water fraction Qsube/sub∕Q to storm characteristics or antecedent wetness conditions. However, these relationships may be obscured because the same factors that influence Qsube/sub also necessarily influence total discharge Q as well. Here we propose that the fractions of event water and pre-event water relative to total precipitation ( Qsube/sub∕P and Qsubpe/sub∕P ), instead of total discharge, provide useful alternative tools for studying catchment storm responses. These two quantities separate the well-known runoff coefficient ( Q∕P , i.e., the ratio between total discharge and precipitation volumes over the event timescale) into its contributions from event water and pre-event water. Whereas the runoff coefficient Q∕P quantifies how strongly precipitation inputs affect streamflow, the fractions Qsube/sub∕P and Qsubpe/sub∕P track the sources of this streamflow response. We use high-frequency measurements of stable water isotopes for 24 storm events at a steep headwater catchment (Erlenbach, central Switzerland) to compare the storm-to-storm variations in Q e / Q , Q e / P and Qsubpe/sub∕P . Our analysis explores how storm characteristics and antecedent wetness conditions affect the mobilization of event water and pre-event water at the catchment scale. Isotopic hydrograph separation shows that catchment outflow was typically dominated by pre-event water, although event water exceeded 50?% of discharge for several storms. No clear relationships were found linking either storm characteristics or antecedent wetness conditions with the volumes of event water or pre-event water ( Qsube/sub , Qsubpe/sub ), or with event water as a fraction of discharge ( Qsube/sub∕Q ), beyond the unsurprising correlation of larger storms with greater Qsube/sub and greater total Q . By contrast, event water as a fraction of precipitation ( Qsube/sub∕P ) was strongly correlated with storm volume and intensity but not with antecedent wetness, implying that the volume of event water that is transmitted to streamflow increases more than proportionally with storm size under both wet and dry conditions. Conversely, pre-event water as a fraction of precipitation ( Qsubpe/sub∕P ) was strongly correlated with all measures of antecedent wetness but not with storm characteristics, implying that wet conditions primarily facilitate the mobilization of old (pre-event) water, rather than the fast transmission of new (event) water to streamflow, even at a catchment where runoff coefficients can be large. Thus, expressing event- and pre-event-water volumes as fractions of precipitation rather than discharge was more insightful for investigating the Erlenbach catchment's hydrological behaviour. If Qsube/sub∕P and Qsubpe/sub∕P exhibit similar relationships with storm characteristics and antecedent wetness conditions in other catchments, we suggest that these patterns may potentially be useful as diagnostic “fingerprints” of catchment storm response.