...
首页> 外文期刊>Hydrology and Earth System Sciences >Investigating temporal field sampling strategies for site-specific calibration of three soil moisture–neutron intensity parameterisation methods
【24h】

Investigating temporal field sampling strategies for site-specific calibration of three soil moisture–neutron intensity parameterisation methods

机译:研究三种特定的土壤湿度中子强度参数化方法的特定场标定的时域采样策略

获取原文
           

摘要

The Cosmic-Ray Neutron Sensor (CRNS) can provide soil moisture information at scales relevant to hydrometeorological modelling applications. Site-specific calibration is needed to translate CRNS neutron intensities into sensor footprint average soil moisture contents. We investigated temporal sampling strategies for calibration of three CRNS parameterisations (modified iN/isub0/sub, HMF, and COSMIC) by assessing the effects of the number of sampling days and soil wetness conditions on the performance of the calibration results while investigating actual neutron intensity measurements, for three sites with distinct climate and land use: a semi-arid site, a temperate grassland, and a temperate forest. When calibrated with 1 year of data, both COSMIC and the modified iN/isub0/sub method performed better than HMF. The performance of COSMIC was remarkably good at the semi-arid site in the USA, while the iN/isub0mod/sub performed best at the two temperate sites in Germany. The successful performance of COSMIC at all three sites can be attributed to the benefits of explicitly resolving individual soil layers (which is not accounted for in the other two parameterisations). To better calibrate these parameterisations, we recommend in situ soil sampled to be collected on more than a single day. However, little improvement is observed for sampling on more than 6 days. At the semi-arid site, the iN/isub0mod/sub method was calibrated better under site-specific average wetness conditions, whereas HMF and COSMIC were calibrated better under drier conditions. Average soil wetness condition gave better calibration results at the two humid sites. The calibration results for the HMF method were better when calibrated with combinations of days with similar soil wetness conditions, opposed to iN/isub0mod/sub and COSMIC, which profited from using days with distinct wetness conditions. Errors in actual neutron intensities were translated to average errors specifically to each site. At the semi-arid site, these errors were below the typical measurement uncertainties from in situ point-scale sensors and satellite remote sensing products. Nevertheless, at the two humid sites, reduction in uncertainty with increasing sampling days only reached typical errors associated with satellite remote sensing products. The outcomes of this study can be used by researchers as a CRNS calibration strategy guideline.
机译:宇宙射线中子传感器(CRNS)可以以与水文气象建模应用相关的尺度提供土壤湿度信息。需要进行现场特定的校准,以将CRNS中子强度转换为传感器足迹平均土壤水分含量。我们通过评估采样天数和土壤湿度条件对CRNS参数化(修改后的 N 0 ,HMF和COSMIC)的参数化,研究了时间采样策略在研究具有不同气候和土地用途的三个地点(半干旱地点,温带草原和温带森林)时,在调查实际中子强度测量结果时校准结果的性能。用1年的数据进行校准时,COSMIC和改进的 N 0 方法的性能均优于HMF。在美国的半干旱地区,COSMIC的性能非常好,而在德国的两个温带地区, N 0mod 的表现最佳。 COSMIC在所有三个地点的成功表现都可以归因于明确解决单个土壤层的好处(这在其他两个参数设置中没有考虑)。为了更好地校准这些参数,我们建议现场采样的土壤要在一天以上的时间内收集。但是,超过6天的采样几乎没有改善。在半干旱地点, N 0mod 方法在特定地点的平均湿度条件下被更好地校准,而HMF和COSMIC在干燥条件下被更好地校准。平均土壤湿度条件在两个湿度点给出了更好的校准结果。当使用具有相似土壤湿度条件的天数组合进行校准时,HMF方法的校准结果更好,而 N 0mod 和COSMIC则相反,后者通过使用具有明显湿度的天数而受益条件。实际中子强度的误差转化为特定于每个位置的平均误差。在半干旱地区,这些误差低于原位点尺度传感器和卫星遥感产品的典型测量不确定度。然而,在两个潮湿的地点,随着采样天数的增加,不确定性的降低仅达到了与卫星遥感产品相关的典型误差。研究人员可以将这项研究的结果用作CRNS校准策略指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号