首页> 外文期刊>Trends in Hearing >Are Experienced Hearing Aid Users Faster at Grasping the Meaning of a Sentence Than Inexperienced Users? An Eye-Tracking Study
【24h】

Are Experienced Hearing Aid Users Faster at Grasping the Meaning of a Sentence Than Inexperienced Users? An Eye-Tracking Study

机译:有经验的助听器用户比没有经验的用户能更快地理解句子的含义吗?眼动研究

获取原文
       

摘要

This study assessed the effects of hearing aid (HA) experience on how quickly a participant can grasp the meaning of an acoustic sentence-in-noise stimulus presented together with two similar pictures that either correctly (target) or incorrectly (competitor) depict the meaning conveyed by the sentence. Using an eye tracker, the time taken by the participant to start fixating the target (the processing time) was measured for two levels of linguistic complexity (low vs. high) and three HA conditions: clinical linear amplification (National Acoustic Laboratories-Revised), single-microphone noise reduction with National Acoustic Laboratories-Revised, and linear amplification ensuring a sensation level of?≥?15?dB up to at least 4?kHz for the speech material used here. Timed button presses to the target stimuli after the end of the sentences (offline reaction times) were also collected. Groups of experienced (eHA) and inexperienced (iHA) HA users matched in terms of age, hearing loss, and working memory capacity took part (N?=?15 each). For the offline reaction times, no effects were found. In contrast, processing times increased with linguistic complexity. Furthermore, for all HA conditions, processing times were longer (poorer) for the iHA group than for the eHA group, despite comparable speech recognition performance. Taken together, these results indicate that processing times are more sensitive to speech processing-related factors than offline reaction times. Furthermore, they support the idea that HA experience positively impacts the ability to process noisy speech quickly, irrespective of the precise gain characteristics.
机译:这项研究评估了助听器(HA)体验对参与者能够多快地掌握声噪声句子刺激的含义以及两个正确(目标)或错误(竞争对手)描述含义的相似图片的影响。通过句子传达。使用眼动仪,针对两种语言复杂程度(从低到高)和三种HA条件,测量了参与者开始固定目标所花费的时间(处理时间):临床线性放大(国家声学实验室修订) ,经美国国家声学实验室修订的单麦克风降噪技术和线性放大功能,可确保此处使用的语音材料的听觉水平至少≥4 kHz时≥15 dB≥15 dB。在句子结束(脱机反应时间)之后,还会收集定时按钮对目标刺激的按压。在年龄,听力损失和工作记忆能力方面匹配的经验丰富(eHA)和经验不足(iHA)HA用户组(每个N = 15)。对于离线反应时间,未发现影响。相反,处理时间随着语言的复杂性而增加。此外,尽管语音识别性能相当,但对于所有HA条件,iHA组的处理时间比eHA组更长(较差)。两者合计,这些结果表明处理时间对语音处理相关因素比离线反应时间更敏感。此外,他们支持这样一种想法,即HA的经验会对快速处理嘈杂语音的能力产生积极影响,而与精确的增益特性无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号