首页> 外文期刊>Hong Kong journal of emergency medicine. >The effects of prearrival direct notification call to interventional cardiologist on door-to-balloon time in patients who required secondary diversion with ST-elevation myocardial infarction for primary percutaneous coronary intervention
【24h】

The effects of prearrival direct notification call to interventional cardiologist on door-to-balloon time in patients who required secondary diversion with ST-elevation myocardial infarction for primary percutaneous coronary intervention

机译:需先行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗而需要继发ST抬高型心肌梗死的患者在到达前直接通知介入心脏病专家对门到气球时间的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: Rapid door-to-balloon times in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention are associated with favorable outcomes. Objectives: We evaluated the effects of prearrival direct notification calls to interventional cardiologists on door-to-balloon time for ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods: A 24-h hotline was created to allow prearrival direct notification calls to interventional cardiologists when transferring ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients. In an urban, tertiary referral center, patients who visited via inter-facility or the emergency department directly were included. Clinical parameters, time to reperfusion therapy, and in-hospital mortality were compared between patients with and without prearrival notifications. Results: Of 228 ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients, 95 (41.7%) were transferred with prearrival notifications. In these patients, door-to-balloon time was shorter (50.0 vs 60.0?min, p?=?0.010) and the proportion of patients with door-to-balloon time??90?min was higher (89.5% vs 75.9%, p?=?0.034) than patients without notifications. These improvements were more pronounced during “off-duty” hours (52.0 vs 78.0?min, p?=?0.001; 88.3% vs 72.3%, p?=?0.047, respectively) than during “on-duty” hours (37.5 vs 43.5?min, p?=?0.164; 94.4% vs 79.4%, p?=?0.274, respectively). In addition, door-to-activation time (–39 vs 11?min, p??0.001) and door-to-catheterization laboratory arrival time (33 vs 42?min, p?=?0.007) were shorter in patients with prearrival notifications than those without. However, in-hospital mortality was similar between the two groups (6.3% vs 6.8%, p?=?0.892). Conclusion: Prearrival direct notification calls to interventional cardiologists significantly improved the door-to-balloon time and the proportion of patients with door-to-balloon time ?90?min through rapid patient transport in primary percutaneous coronary intervention scheduled hospital and readiness of the catheterization laboratory.
机译:背景:ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者接受初次经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的快速门到气球时间与良好的预后相关。目的:我们评估了接受介入心脏病学家的到达前直接通知电话对接受原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的ST抬高型心肌梗死患者门到气球时间的影响。方法:建立了24小时热线,以便在转移ST抬高型心肌梗死患者时允许在到达前直接致电介入心脏病专家。在城市三级转诊中心,包括通过机构间或急诊科直接就诊的患者。比较了有或没有到达前通知的患者的临床参数,再灌注治疗时间和院内死亡率。结果:在228例ST抬高型心肌梗死患者中,有95例(41.7%)在到达前得到通知。在这些患者中,上气球时间较短(50.0 vs. 60.0?min,p?=?0.010),而上气球时间≥90?min的患者比例则更高(89.5%vs 75.9) %,p?=?0.034),而不通知患者。与“值班”时段(37.5 vs)相比,这些“改善”在“下班”小时(52.0 vs. 78.0?min,p?=?0.001; 88.3%vs 72.3%,p?=?0.047)更明显。 43.5min,p = 0.164; 94.4%对79.4%,p = 0.274。此外,患有以下疾病的患者的上门激活时间(–39 vs 11?min,p 0.001)和上门导管实验室到达时间(33 vs 42?min,p?= 0.007)更短。到达前通知比没有通知。但是,两组的院内死亡率相似(6.3%vs 6.8%,p = 0.892)。结论:通过在初级经皮冠状动脉介入治疗预定医院进行快速患者转运和到达医院的准备就绪,在介入前,直接向介入心脏病学家打电话通知可以大大缩短门诊气球时间,并缩短门诊气球时间<90分钟的患者比例。导管实验室。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号