首页> 外文期刊>Hereditas >Mapping of QTLs associated with biological nitrogen fixation traits in soybean
【24h】

Mapping of QTLs associated with biological nitrogen fixation traits in soybean

机译:与大豆生物固氮性状相关的QTL定位

获取原文
           

摘要

Nitrogen (N), the element most limiting for crop growth, is usually supplied by application of fertilizer, but at substantial costs to farmers and with potentially adverse effects on the environment. Soybean Glycine max (L.) Merr., among other legumes, can obtain N through biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), and breeding for yield improvement can be performed considering BNF, inorganic-N supply, or both (Coale et al. 1985; Kumudini et al. 2008). The BNF results from the symbiosis between legumes with a diverse group of nitrogen fixing soil bacteria collectively known as rhizobia. This association is mutually beneficial: while bacteria provide a source of nitrogen to plant development, plants provide carbon sources for maintaining bacteria metabolism.The establishment of the symbioses involves complex mechanisms starting with the mutual exchange of diffusible signal molecules. Plants secrete seed and root molecules – mainly flavonoids – that are sensed by specific rhizobia. In response, the rhizobia produce lipochitooligosaccharides namely Nod factors (NFs) that are recognized by LysM receptor-like kinase of the legumes. A new organ – the nodule – is then formed on the root and hosts the nitrogen fixing bacteria (Subramanian et al. 2006; Kouchi et al. 2010).The elicitation and the development of an effective nodule are accompanied by the expression of specific genes in both rhizobia and their host-plants. The genetic mechanisms of the bacteria are best understood and several rhizobial genes called nod, nol and noe have been described (Masson-Boivin et al. 2009). On the other side, studies with the host-plants are more complex, due to biological characteristics and genome sizes. More recently, the integration of genetic and genomic approaches and the adoption of legume models with Medicago truncatula and Lotus japonicum opened a framework to the investigation of host genes essential for the BNF process. Twenty-six genes involved with Nod perception and different steps of nodule formation were characterized based on mutants, cloning and mapping strategies (Kouchi et al. 2010). Furthermore, dozens of genes involved in nodule formation and in the BNF process called nodulin genes have been prospected by high throughput tools, such as expressed sequence tags and microarray analysis (Brechenmacher et al. 2008; Libault et al. 2010).In soybean, several loci controlling nodulation have been described since the 1950s. Williams and Lynch (1954) reported the recessive gene rj1 in a spontaneous non-nodulating mutant. Genes rj2 (Caldwell 1966), rj3 (Vest 1970) and rj4 (Vest and Caldwell 1972) have natural occurrence and control strain specific restricted nodulation. In addition, genes rj5 and rj6 (Harper and Nickell 1995) – conferring non-nodulation ability – have been identified by chemical induced mutation and correspond to the same loci of the rj1. Supernodulating mutants (rj7 and rj8) have also been generated by chemical mutagenesis (Vuong et al. 1996).Some of these genes controlling nodulation in soybean have been cloned and their products have been described. The first gene related to nodulation control in soybean was cloned by Searle et al. (2003) using the rj7 and rj8 supernodulating mutants. By similar approaches the Nod factor receptor genes called NFR1α and NFR1β (Indrasumunar et al. 2011) and NFR5α and NFR5β (Indrasumunar et al. 2010) were cloned. Similar genes were first identified by mutant directed cloning in Medicago truncatula (Amor et al. 2003; Limpens et al. 2003), L. japonicus (Madsen et al. 2003; Radutoiu et al. 2003) and pea (Pisum sativum) (Zhukov et al. 2008).These discoveries provide important clues to understand the molecular mechanisms of host regulation of the symbiosis. However, more information with field orientation is necessary to access the potential of breeding for BNF. The occurrence of natural variability on nodulation and efficiency of BNF in soybean have been reported (Neuhausen et al. 1988; Sinclair et a
机译:氮(N)是限制作物生长的元素,通常通过施肥来提供,但给农民带来了沉重的成本,并可能对环境造成不利影响。除其他豆类外,大豆大豆可以通过生物固氮(BNF)获得氮,可以通过考虑BNF和/或无机氮的供应或两者来进行育种以提高产量(Coale等人,1985年; Null。 Kumudini et al。2008)。 BNF是由豆科植物与多种固氮土壤细菌(共称为根瘤菌)之间的共生产生的。这种联系是互惠互利的:细菌为植物发育提供了氮源,而植物则为维持细菌的代谢提供了碳源。共生酶的建立涉及复杂的机制,这些机制始于可扩散信号分子的相互交换。植物分泌种子和根部分子-主要是类黄酮-被特定的根瘤菌感测到。作为响应,根瘤菌产生脂低聚寡糖,即被豆类的LysM受体样激酶识别的Nod因子(NFs)。然后在根部形成一个新的器官-结节,并容纳固氮细菌(Subramanian et al。2006; Kouchi et al。2010)。有效结节的诱导和发展伴随特定基因的表达在根瘤菌及其寄主植物中细菌的遗传机制已得到最好的了解,并且已经描述了几种称为nod,nol和noe的根瘤菌基因(Masson-Boivin等,2009)。另一方面,由于生物学特性和基因组大小,对宿主植物的研究更为复杂。最近,遗传学和基因组学方法的整合以及豆科植物ca藜和日本莲花的豆科植物模型的采用为研究BNF进程必不可少的宿主基因打开了一个框架。根据突变体,克隆和作图策略,对涉及Nod感知和结节形成不同步骤的26个基因进行了表征(Kouchi等,2010)。此外,通过高通量工具(例如表达的序列标签和微阵列分析)已经探明了数十个参与结节形成和BNF进程的基因,称为结节蛋白基因(Brechenmacher et al.2008; Libault et al.2010)。自1950年代以来,已经描述了几个控制结瘤的基因座。威廉姆斯和林奇(Williams and Lynch,1954)报道了一种隐性基因rj1,它是自发的非结节突变体。基因rj2(Caldwell 1966),rj3(Vest 1970)和rj4(Vest and Caldwell 1972)具有自然发生并控制菌株特有的限制结瘤。此外,通过化学诱导突变鉴定了赋予非结瘤能力的基因rj5和rj6(Harper和Nickell 1995),它们与rj1的相同基因座相对应。化学诱变也产生了超结瘤突变体(rj7和rj8)(Vuong et al。1996)。已经克隆了控制大豆中结瘤的一些基因,并对其产物进行了描述。大豆中与结瘤控制有关的第一个基因由Searle等人克隆。 (2003)使用rj7和rj8超结瘤突变体。通过类似的方法,克隆了称为NFR1α和NFR1β(Indrasumunar等,2011)和NFR5α和NFR5β(Indrasumunar等,2010)的Nod因子受体基因。相似的基因首先通过截短苜蓿(Amor等,2003; Limpens等,2003),日本乳杆菌(Madsen等,2003; Radutoiu等,2003)和豌豆(Pisum sativum)(Zhukov)的定向突变克隆来鉴定。等(2008)。这些发现为了解共生宿主调控的分子机制提供了重要线索。但是,需要更多具有野外定向的信息,才能获得BNF育种的潜力。已有报道大豆中BNF的结节和效率存在自然变异(Neuhausen等人1988; Sinclair等人

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号