首页> 外文期刊>HBRC Journal >Assessment of different construction and demolition waste management approaches
【24h】

Assessment of different construction and demolition waste management approaches

机译:评估不同拆建废物管理方法

获取原文
           

摘要

The waste generated from construction and demolition sites is considered one of the most irritating problems in Egypt. In the last 10years some effort has been made toward solving this problem, the most outstanding is the newly issued Egyptian rating system “Green Pyramids Rating System”. It emphasizes on waste management and particularly “site provision and environment” which contributes to 75% of the management category score. However the traditional practice which is limited to dumping all the generated waste is still dominating. The absence of sustainable practices in construction sector in Egypt led to the lack in financial and environmental data. From strategic perspective, the research aims at developing a detailed procedure to evaluate two construction and demolition waste management approaches by means of Decision Matrix technique. A detailed study is introduced for the two approaches; for each approach a flow chart is developed to demonstrate its lifecycle, as well as the cost break down structure and the different stakeholders’ roles. A penetration discussion of the pros and cons for each approach was developed accordingly and came out with sixteen influencing attributes for both approaches. The previous steps paved the ground to construct a Decision Matrix to decide on one of the approaches from a strategic environmentally oriented perspective. The study relied on the detailed and deep demonstration of the two approaches to justify the assigned weight for attributes and scores for corresponding approach. From a strategic perspective, the decision came out in favor of the more environmentally friendly approach.
机译:建筑和拆迁现场产生的废物被认为是埃及最令人讨厌的问题之一。在过去的十年中,为解决这个问题做出了一些努力,其中最杰出的是新发布的埃及评级系统“绿色金字塔评级系统”。它强调废物管理,尤其是“场地提供和环境”,占管理类别得分的75%。但是,仅限于倾倒所有产生的废物的传统做法仍占主导地位。埃及建筑部门缺乏可持续实践,导致缺乏财务和环境数据。从战略角度看,本研究旨在制定详细的程序,以决策矩阵技术评估两种建筑和拆除废物管理方法。对这两种方法进行了详细的研究。对于每种方法,都将开发流程图以说明其生命周期,成本分解结构以及不同利益相关者的角色。因此,针对每种方法的优缺点进行了深入的讨论,并提出了两种方法的十六种影响属性。前面的步骤为构建决策矩阵奠定了基础,以便从面向环境的战略角度确定一种方法。该研究依靠两种方法的详细而深入的论证来证明分配给属性的权重和相应方法的得分是合理的。从战略角度来看,做出这一决定是为了支持更环保的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号