首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Effective construction and demolition waste management assessment through waste management hierarchy; a case of Australian large construction companies
【24h】

Effective construction and demolition waste management assessment through waste management hierarchy; a case of Australian large construction companies

机译:通过废物管理层次结构有效建设和拆迁废物管理评估; 澳大利亚大型建筑公司的案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The construction industry accounts for an enormous quantity of construction and demolition waste (CDW) where its improper management jeopardizes social, environmental, and economic resources. Although several studies have investigated some aspects of construction and demolition waste management (CDWM), there is a substantial need to empirically analysing effective construction and demolition waste management (ECDWM) considering its contributing factors and the CDWM hierarchy (CDWMH). A framework was proposed to assess the effectiveness of CDWM using CDW stakeholders' attitudes (CDWSA), CDWM within project life cycles (CDWPLC), CDWM with respect to sustainability (SCDWM), and CDWM tools (CDWMT) as factors that effectively affect CDWM, and CDWMH as the most effective strategy to manage CDW, leading to the effective management of CDW. This study analyzed ECDWM in Australia. Thus, 108 large construction companies were approached via an online questionnaire. Data were analyzed through partial least squares based structural equation modelling using SmartPLS. Results (path coefficients) could prove that CDWSA was the most effective factor to CDWM, while CDWPLC was the least effective (ineffective). In addition, recycling strategy received more attention than reusing and reducing strategies, which contrasts with the nature of CDWMH. The study is relevant for CDW professionals as well as academicians involved in CDWM.
机译:建筑业占巨大的建设和拆迁废物(CDW),其管理不当危害社会,环境和经济资源。虽然有几项研究已经调查了建筑和拆迁废物管理的某些方面(CDWM),但考虑到其贡献因素和CDWM等级(CDWMH),实质性需要明确地分析有效的建设和拆除废物管理(ECDWM)。建议使用CDW利益相关者态度(CDWSA),项目生命周期(CDWPLC),CDWM的CDWM,CDWM相对于可持续性(SCDWM)和CDWM工具(CDWMT)的效果来评估CDWM的有效性,以及有效地影响CDWM的因素,和CDWMH作为管理CDW最有效的策略,导致CDW的有效管理。这项研究分析了澳大利亚的ECDWM。因此,通过在线问卷接近108家大型建筑公司。通过使用SmartPL的基于部分最小二乘结构的结构方程建模分析数据。结果(路径系数)可以证明CDWSA是CDWM最有效的因素,而CDWPLC是最不有效的(无效)。此外,回收策略比重用和减少策略更多的关注,与CDWMH的性质形成鲜明对比。该研究与CDW专业人员以及参与CDWM的院士相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号