首页> 外文期刊>Health Research Policy and Systems >Policy and practice impacts of applied research: a case study analysis of the New South Wales Health Promotion Demonstration Research Grants Scheme 2000–2006
【24h】

Policy and practice impacts of applied research: a case study analysis of the New South Wales Health Promotion Demonstration Research Grants Scheme 2000–2006

机译:应用研究的政策和实践影响:新南威尔士州健康促进示范研究补助金计划2000–2006的案例分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Intervention research provides important information regarding feasible and effective interventions for health policy makers, but few empirical studies have explored the mechanisms by which these studies influence policy and practice. This study provides an exploratory case series analysis of the policy, practice and other related impacts of the 15 research projects funded through the New South Wales Health Promotion Demonstration Research Grants Scheme during the period 2000 to 2006, and explored the factors mediating impacts. Methods Data collection included semi-structured interviews with the chief investigators (n = 17) and end-users (n = 29) of each of the 15 projects to explore if, how and under what circumstances the findings had been used, as well as bibliometric analysis and verification using documentary evidence. Data analysis involved thematic coding of interview data and triangulation with other data sources to produce case summaries of impacts for each project. Case summaries were then individually assessed against four impact criteria and discussed at a verification panel meeting where final group assessments of the impact of research projects were made and key influences of research impact identified. Results Funded projects had variable impacts on policy and practice. Project findings were used for agenda setting (raising awareness of issues), identifying areas and target groups for interventions, informing new policies, and supporting and justifying existing policies and programs across sectors. Reported factors influencing the use of findings were: i) nature of the intervention; ii) leadership and champions; iii) research quality; iv) effective partnerships; v) dissemination strategies used; and, vi) contextual factors. Conclusions The case series analysis provides new insights into how and under what circumstances intervention research is used to influence real world policy and practice. The findings highlight that intervention research projects can achieve the greatest policy and practice impacts if they address proximal needs of the policy context by engaging end-users from the inception of projects and utilizing existing policy networks and structures, and using a range of strategies to disseminate findings that go beond traditional peer review publications.
机译:背景干预研究为卫生政策制定者提供了有关可行和有效干预措施的重要信息,但是很少有实证研究探索这些研究影响政策和实践的机制。这项研究对2000年至2006年期间由新南威尔士州健康促进示范研究补助金计划资助的15个研究项目的政策,实践和其他相关影响进行了探索性案例系列分析,并探讨了影响影响的因素。方法数据收集包括对15个项目中的每个项目的首席调查员(n = 17)和最终用户(n = 29)进行半结构化访谈,以探讨是否,如何以及在何种情况下使用了调查结果,以及使用文献证据进行文献计量分析和验证。数据分析涉及访谈数据的主题编码以及与其他数据源的三角剖分,以生成每个项目影响的案例摘要。然后根据四个影响标准对案例摘要进行单独评估,并在验证小组会议上进行讨论,会议上将对研究项目的影响进行最终小组评估,并确定研究影响的关键影响。结果资助项目对政策和实践产生了不同的影响。项目调查结果用于议程设置(提高对问题的认识),确定要干预的领域和目标群体,提供新政策以及支持和证明各部门现有政策和计划的合理性。报告的影响调查结果使用的因素是:i)干预的性质; ii)领导和拥护者; iii)研究质量; iv)有效的伙伴关系; v)所采用的传播策略; vi)情境因素。结论案例系列分析为干预研究如何以及在什么情况下用于影响现实世界的政策和实践提供了新的见解。研究结果表明,如果干预研究项目通过从项目开始时就吸引最终用户并利用现有的政策网络和结构,并使用一系列策略进行传播,从而满足政策环境的近端需求,则它们可以实现最大的政策和实践影响。在传统同行评审出版物之后的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号