首页> 外文期刊>Head Face Medicine >Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis
【24h】

Three lateral osteotomy designs for bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: biomechanical evaluation with three-dimensional finite element analysis

机译:双侧矢状劈开截骨术的三种侧截骨术设计:通过三维有限元分析进行生物力学评估

获取原文
       

摘要

Background The location of the lateral osteotomy cut during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) varies according to the surgeon's preference, and no consensus has been reached regarding the ideal location from the perspective of biomechanics. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mechanical behavior of the mandible and screw-miniplate system among three lateral osteotomy designs for BSSO by using three-dimensional (3-D) finite element analysis (FEA). Methods The Trauner-Obwegeser (TO), Obwegeser (Ob), and Obwegeser-Dal Pont (OD) methods were used for BSSO. In all the FEA simulations, the distal segments were advanced by 5 mm. Each model was fixed by using miniplates. These were applied at four different locations, including along Champy's lines, to give 12 different FEA miniplate fixation methods. We examined these models under two different loads. Results The magnitudes of tooth displacement, the maximum bone stress in the vicinity of the screws, and the maximum stress on the screw-miniplate system were less in the OD method than in the Ob and TO methods at all the miniplate locations. In addition, Champy's lines models were less than those at the other miniplate locations. Conclusions The OD method allows greater mechanical stability of the mandible than the other two techniques. Further, miniplates placed along Champy's lines provide greater mechanical advantage than those placed at other locations.
机译:背景技术在双侧矢状劈开截骨术(BSSO)期间,外侧截骨术的位置根据外科医生的喜好而异,从生物力学的角度,关于理想的位置尚未达成共识。这项研究的目的是通过使用三维(3-D)有限元分析(FEA)来评估BSSO的三种侧向截骨术设计中的下颌骨和螺钉-微型钢板系统的机械性能。方法BSSO使用Trauner-Obwegeser(TO),Obwegeser(Ob)和Obwegeser-Dal Pont(OD)方法。在所有的FEA模拟中,远端节段都前进了5毫米。每种型号均使用微型平板固定。将它们应用在四个不同的位置,包括沿Champy线的位置,以提供12种不同的FEA微型板固定方法。我们在两个不同的负载下检查了这些模型。结果OD法在所有微型板位置上的牙齿位移量,螺钉附近的最大骨应力以及螺钉-微型板系统上的最大应力均小于Ob和TO方法。此外,Champy的线模型比其他小孔板位置的模型少。结论OD法比其他两种技术具有更大的下颌骨机械稳定性。此外,沿Champy线放置的微型板比放置在其他位置的微型板具有更大的机械优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号