...
首页> 外文期刊>Yonsei Medical Journal >Endoscopic mucosal resection with a ligation device for early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions: comparison of its therapeutic efficacy with surgical resection
【24h】

Endoscopic mucosal resection with a ligation device for early gastric cancer and precancerous lesions: comparison of its therapeutic efficacy with surgical resection

机译:带结扎装置的内窥镜黏膜切除术用于早期胃癌和癌前病变的治疗效果与手术切除术的比较

获取原文

摘要

Endoscopic mucosal resection with a ligation device (EMR-L) has become important in the curative treatment of precancerous lesions and early gastric cancers (EGCs), but little is known of the long-term efficacy and survival rates of EMR-L compared with surgical resection. We analyzed the therapeutic efficacy and safety of EMR-L in cases of EGC and precancerous lesions and compared the results of EMR-L with those of gastrectomy in patients with EGC over the same periods. EMR-L was performed on 20 EGCs and 54 precancerous lesions including tubular adenomas with or without severe dysplasias in 74 patients. Macroscopic type, size and location of the lesion were determined by endoscope, and the depth of invasion in EGCs was determined by endoscopic ultrasonography and confirmed by pathologic examination of the resected specimens. All the EGC cases were endoscopically followed up for at least 18 months (range, 18-66 months). Patients were selected that underwent subtotal gastrectomy and the survival rates were compared with those that underwent EMR-L. Complete resection was made in a single EMR-L treatment session in 61 cases (82.4%; 91.5%, were precancerous lesions and 65% were EGCs). After a repeat trial of EMR-L, the total rate of complete resection of precancerous lesions and EGCs was 92.6% and 85.0%, respectively. The survival rate of EGCs showed that complete resection by EMR-L resulted in 2 and 5 year survival rates of 100% and 95%, which are comparable to those of surgery (100% and 100%). This study suggests that EMR-L is a technically simple, minimally invasive and highly safe and effective treatment modality for selective EGCs, and offers an alternative to surgical treatment.
机译:内镜下使用结扎装置进行粘膜切除术在癌前病变和早期胃癌(EGCs)的治疗中已变得很重要,但与手术相比,EMR-L的长期疗效和生存率知之甚少切除。我们分析了EMR-L在EGC和癌前病变中的治疗效果和安全性,并比较了EMR患者在同一时期的EMR-L与胃切除术的结果。在74例患者中,对20例EGC和54例癌前病变(包括肾小管腺瘤伴或不伴严重异型增生)进行了EMR-L检查。通过内窥镜确定病变的宏观类型,大小和位置,并通过内窥镜超声检查确定EGC中的浸润深度,并通过对切除标本进行病理检查来确认。所有EGC病例均接受内镜随访至少18个月(范围18-66个月)。选择接受胃大部切除术的患者,并将生存率与接受EMR-L的患者进行比较。单次EMR-L治疗完全切除61例(82.4%; 91.5%为癌前病变,65%为EGC)。再次进行EMR-L试验后,癌前病变和EGC完全切除的总比率分别为92.6%和85.0%。 EGCs的生存率表明,EMR-L完全切除后的2年和5年生存率分别为100%和95%,与手术的生存率(100%和100%)相当。这项研究表明,EMR-L是选择性EGC的技术简单,微创和高度安全有效的治疗方式,并为手术治疗提供了替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号