首页> 外文期刊>World Journal of Surgical Oncology >Laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration for pelvic malignancies: the technique and short-time outcome of 11 cases
【24h】

Laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration for pelvic malignancies: the technique and short-time outcome of 11 cases

机译:腹腔镜盆腔全切除术治疗盆腔恶性肿瘤11例技术及近期疗效

获取原文
           

摘要

Previous reports about laparoscopic total pelvic exenteration (LTPE) are still limited. In the present study, we described our single-center experience of the initial 11 cases. Between April 2011 and September 2015, eight males and three females diagnosed as pelvic malignancies underwent LTPE by the same operation team. We retrospectively collected all cases’ parameters about surgical technique. Thirty-seven patients who received open surgery were also retrospectively collected. A comparison between LTPE and open surgery was performed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of LTPE. Eleven cases successfully underwent the LTPE without any intraoperative complication. No open conversion was required. Eight patients underwent Bricker’s procedure. Three patients were performed with the cutaneous ureterostomy. Anus preservation operation was performed in three patients. Compared with open surgery, LTPE had longer mean operative time (565.2 vs 468.2?min, p?=?0.004) but less mean blood loss (547.3 vs 1033.0?ml, p?
机译:以前有关腹腔镜全盆腔引流术(LTPE)的报道仍然有限。在本研究中,我们描述了最初11例病例的单中心经验。在2011年4月至2015年9月之间,同一手术团队对八名男性和三名女性诊断为盆腔恶性肿瘤进行了LTPE。我们回顾性收集了所有病例的手术技术参数。还回顾性收集了37例接受了开放手术的患者。对LTPE和开放手术进行了比较,以评估LTPE的可行性和安全性。 11例成功进行了LTPE,无任何术中并发症。无需公开转换。八名患者接受了Bricker的手术。三例患者行皮肤输尿管造口术。三名患者进行了肛门保存手术。与开放手术相比,LTPE的平均手术时间更长(565.2 vs 468.2?min,p <= 0.004),但平均失血较少(547.3 vs 1033.0?ml,p 0.001),并且术后住院时间更短(15.3vs。 22.4天,p≤0.004)。一名患者在随访时间的第7个月死于肺栓塞。一名患者在随访时间的第12个月死于复发。九名患者还活着,没有复发和转移。平均随访时间为11.1个月。 LTPE技术在精心挑选的盆腔恶性肿瘤患者中似乎是可行和安全的。 LTPE还可以减少失血量,恢复时间和住院时间。但是,LTPE的肿瘤学安全性和长期结果仍然有待探索。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号