...
首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >Clinician-performed Beside Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Traumatic Pneumothorax
【24h】

Clinician-performed Beside Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Traumatic Pneumothorax

机译:超声检查在临床上对创伤性气胸的诊断

获取原文

摘要

Introduction: Prior studies have reported conflicting results regarding the utility of ultrasound in the diagnosis of traumatic pneumothorax (PTX) because they have used sonologists with extensive experience. This study evaluates the characteristics of ultrasound for PTX for a large cohort of trauma and emergency physicians. Methods: This was a prospective, observational study on a convenience sample of patients presenting to a trauma center who had a thoracic ultrasound (TUS) evaluation for PTX performed after the Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma exam. Sonologists recorded their findings prior to any other diagnostic studies. The results of TUS were compared to one or more of the following: chest computed tomography, escape of air on chest tube insertion, or supine chest radiography followed by clinical observation. Results: There were 549 patients enrolled. The median injury severity score of the patients was 5 (inter-quartile range [IQR] 1-14); 36 different sonologists performed TUS. Forty-seven of the 549 patients had traumatic PTX, for an incidence of 9%. TUS correctly identified 27/47 patients with PTX for a sensitivity of 57% (confidence interval [CI] 42-72%). There were 3 false positive cases of TUS for a specificity of 99% (CI 98%-100%). A “wet” chest radiograph reading done in the trauma bay showed a sensitivity of 40% (CI 23-59) and a specificity of 100% (99-100). Conclusion: In a large heterogenous group of clinicians who typically care for trauma patients, the sonographic evaluation for pneumothorax was as accurate as supine chest radiography. Thoracic ultrasound may be helpful in the initial evaluation of patients with truncal trauma. [West J Emerg Med 2013;14(2):103-108.].
机译:简介:先前的研究报道了超声在创伤性气胸(PTX)诊断中的实用性存在矛盾的结果,因为他们聘用了具有丰富经验的超声学家。这项研究评估了大量创伤和急诊医师队列中PTX的超声特征。方法:这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,研究对象为创伤中心就诊的患者,该患者在接受超声聚焦评估创伤检查后进行了胸腔超声(TUS)评估PTX。超声医师在进行任何其他诊断研究之前先记录他们的发现。将TUS的结果与以下一项或多项进行比较:胸部X线断层扫描,插入胸管时漏气,或仰卧位X线摄影,然后进行临床观察。结果:共有549例患者入组。患者的中位严重程度评分为5(四分位间距[IQR] 1-14); 36位不同的超声学家进行了TUS。 549名患者中有47名患有创伤性PTX,发生率为9%。 TUS正确识别了27/47名PTX患者,敏感性为57%(置信区间[CI] 42-72%)。有3例TUS假阳性病例的特异性为99%(CI 98%-100%)。在外伤部位进行的“湿”胸片检查显示敏感性为40%(CI 23-59),特异性为100%(99-100)。结论:在一大批通常护理创伤患者的异类临床医生中,气胸的超声检查结果与仰卧位胸片检查一样准确。胸腔超声检查可能有助于对创伤性患者的初步评估。 [West J Emerg Med 2013; 14(2):103-108。]。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号