首页> 外文期刊>Western Journal of Emergency Medicine >Comparison of the Standardized Video Interview and Interview Assessments of Professionalism and Interpersonal Communication Skills in Emergency Medicine
【24h】

Comparison of the Standardized Video Interview and Interview Assessments of Professionalism and Interpersonal Communication Skills in Emergency Medicine

机译:急诊医学专业人士和人际交往技巧的标准视频访谈和访谈评估的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: In March 2018, the Centers for Medicareand Medicaid Services (CMS) announced that medical studentdocumentation of patient care services would be acceptedfor billing purposes. Starting in August 2018, all fourthyearmedical students enrolled in the four-week emergencymedicine (EM) rotation at our academic emergencydepartment (ED) undergo two hours of documentation trainingas part of orientation and then assume sole responsibility fordocumentation of all patients under their care. Faculty reviseand co-sign these notes according to institutional policy.Given the recency of the change in CMS policy, it is unknownhow implementing medical student documentation affects thelearner and educator experiences.Objectives: We sought to characterize EM facultyperception of medical student responsibility for documentationin an academic ED. We hypothesized that faculty may findthe need to heavily revise student notes to not be worth theassistance given in writing them, and that this may result inless face-to-face education between students and faculty.Methods: To assess educator experience, a web-basedsurvey was created and distributed by e-mail to all EM facultywithin our department starting October 2018. Responsechoices were modeled after validated Likert-type scaleresponse anchors. All responses were recorded anonymously.Results: We received 29 faculty responses (81% responserate) to the survey. Their responses were as follows: 79%of faculty members perceived medical student notes to be“always” or “usually” useful for clinical documentation; 86%felt that student notes “always,” “usually,” or “frequently”contained enough information for billing and coding; 93%“strongly agreed” or “agreed” that it is worth revising andco-signing student notes compared to faculty writing notesthemselves; and 69% of faculty noticed themselves havingmore face-to-face interaction with students on shift whenstudents wrote notes compared to when they didn’t. Nearly allfaculty (97%) found medical students to be a more useful partof the team when students write notes.Conclusion: Although limited to a single academicED, our results suggest that implementing medical studentdocumentation responsibility can result in high EM facultysatisfaction, increased face-to-face interaction between facultyand students, and a more prominent role for medical studentson the physician team.
机译:背景:2018年3月,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)宣布,将接受医护学生对患者护理服务的单据以进行计费。从2018年8月开始,所有在我们的学术急诊科(ED)参加为期四周的急诊医学(EM)轮换培训的四年级医学学生都接受了两个小时的文献培训,作为入职培训的一部分,然后承担对所护理的所有患者进行文献鉴定的全部责任。教师会根据机构政策修订和共同签署这些说明。鉴于CMS政策的最新变化,未知的是,实施医学生文档会如何影响学习者和教育者的体验。目的:我们试图描述EM教师对医学生对文档责任的感知的特征。学术教育。我们假设教师可能会发现需要大量修改学生笔记以使其不值得在编写笔记时给予帮助,并且这可能导致学生与教师之间进行面对面的教育。方法:评估教育者的经验,基于网络的调查从2018年10月开始通过电子邮件创建并分发给我们系内的所有EM系。响应选择是在经过验证的Likert型量表响应锚之后建模的。结果:我们收到了29名教师的答复(81%的答复)。他们的回答如下:79%的教职员工认为医学生的笔记对临床文档“总是”或“通常”有用; 86%的学生认为“总是”,“通常”或“经常”记录了足够的信息以进行计费和编码; 93%的人“强烈同意”或“同意”,与教师自己写的笔记相比,值得修改和共同签署学生的笔记;和69%的教师发现,与不上课时相比,他们在轮班上与学生进行面对面互动时,他们会更多地与学生互动。几乎所有的教职员工(97%)发现,在学生写笔记时,医学生是团队中更有用的一部分。结论:尽管限于一位学历生,但我们的结果表明,履行医学生的文档责任可能会导致高EM教师的满意度,增加面对面的机会师生之间的互动,以及医学生在医师团队中的重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号